The Value of Privacy Assurance: An Exploratory Field Experiment

By Kai Lung Hui, Hock Hai Teo, Sang-Yong Tom Lee. MIS Q., 2007

690 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Information Systems and Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/17017df8ea07422a7d58b302591b5706d23a8498

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Information Systems and Management

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

The Role of Push-Pull Technology in Privacy Calculus: The Case of Location-Based Services (2009, background): “This calculus perspective is especially evident in empirical studies of consumer privacy concerns (e.g., [23, 29, 36, 38, 52]). according to these studies, consumers perform a risk–benefit analysis of all the factors related to a particular information disclosure situation in order to assess…”
Internet Users' Information Privacy-Protective Responses: A Taxonomy and a Nomological Model (2008, background): “For example, Hui et al. (2007) found that Internet users are more likely to reveal their personal information when they read a privacy statement outlining information practices of online companies.”
Information Privacy Concerns: Linking Individual Perceptions with Institutional Privacy Assurances (2011, neutral): “Prior studies have reported similar weak effects of privacy seals on mitigating privacy risk (Hui et al., 2007; Moores, 2005; Moores & Dhillon, 2003).”
Blissfully ignorant: the effects of general privacy concerns, general institutional trust, and affect in the privacy calculus (2015, result): “This view is supported by prior studies that did not only identify small or non-significant relationships between privacy concerns and actual disclosing behavior (e.g. Hui et al., 2007) but also between privacy concerns and behavioral intentions (Awad &d Krishnan, 2006; Van Slyke et al., 2006).”
Effects of reputation and website quality on online consumers' emotion, perceived risk and purchase intention (2013, background): “In addition, initial research on e-commerce indicated that risk related to loss of consumers’ privacy and security of personal information was an important barrier to consumers’ internet adoption and use (Hui et al., 2007), stressing the importance of web site quality related to security and privacy”
Privacy in the Digital Age: A Review of Information Privacy Research in Information Systems (2011, background): “For example, monetary incentives (Hui et al. 2007) and less sensitivity about the secondary use of data (Culnan 1993) positively affect students’ willingness to disclose information.”
Internet Privacy Concerns: An Integrated Conceptualization and Four Empirical Studies (2013, methodology): “Recent studies using the instrument either showed that the collection dimension does not converge well with the other three dimensions of IPC (e.g., Angst and Agarwal 2009), or have omitted the collection dimension in their measurement of IPC (e.g., Hui et al. 2007; Junglas et al. 2008).”
What Is Privacy Worth? (2013, neutral): “Hui et al. (2007) used a field experiment in Singapore to study the value of various privacy assurance measures, finding that privacy statements and monetary incentives could induce individuals to disclose personal information.”
Adoption of Electronic Health Records in the Presence of Privacy Concerns: The Elaboration Likelihood Model and Individual Persuasion (2009, methodology): “Finally, CFIP has been used as a control variable in an attempt to isolate and identify the value of privacy assurances on Web pages (Hui et al. 2007).”
Information Privacy Research: An Interdisciplinary Review (2011, background): “Skepticism about the effectiveness of industry self-regulation in protecting consumer privacy (Edelman 2011; Hui et al. 2007) has resulted in privacy advocates and consumers clamoring for strong and effective legislation to curtail rampant abuses of information by firms.”