Information Privacy Research: An Interdisciplinary Review

By H. Jeff Smith, Tamara Dinev, Heng Xu. 2011

2,106 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

In Safety Research

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Single-Model Uncertainties for Deep Learning (2018, background): “[5], uncertainty quantification is a problem of paramount importance when deploying machine learning models in sensitive domains such as information security [72], engineering [82], transportation [87], and medicine [5], to name a few.”
Unaddressed privacy risks in accredited health and wellness apps: a cross-sectional systematic assessment (2015, background): “Health apps may put patient privacy, defined here as the right of individuals to con-trol how their information is collected and used [7] (other definitions are possible [8]), at risk in a number of ways [9].”
Linking information systems and entrepreneurship: A review and agenda for IT‐associated and digital entrepreneurship research (2018, neutral): “Such reviews are common (eg, Bélanger & Crossler, 2011; Connelly, Certo, Ireland, & Reutzel, 2011; Smith, Dinev, & Xu, 2011) in these disciplines.”
Counteracting the Negative Effect of Form Auto-completion on the Privacy Calculus (2013, background): “2011, 2009), and it has become a wellestablished concept in privacy research (Li 2012; Pavlou 2011; Smith et al. 2011).”
The privacy paradox - Investigating discrepancies between expressed privacy concerns and actual online behavior - A systematic literature review (2017, background): “At the same time however, research indicates that consumers are concerned about their privacy, including the ambiguous distribution of data and its use by third parties (Smith et al., 2011).”
Consumers' decisions in social commerce context: An empirical investigation (2015, background): “On the other hand, consumers will be more likely to share their own information with trusted parties due to the privacy concern [37].”
Risk, trust, and the interaction of perceived ease of use and behavioral control in predicting consumers' use of social media for transactions (2018, background): “…and trust, current press, government guidelines and literature are highlighting social networking services as the vector of choice for spreading vulnerability exploits (e.g., Anderson & Agarwal, 2010; Dinev, Goo, Hu, & Nam, 2009; Dinev, 2014; Mitra & Ransbotham, 2015; Smith, Dinev, & Xu, 2011).”
Privacy-Preserving Solutions for Blockchain: Review and Challenges (2019, background): “Furthermore, [35] provided an interdisciplinary review on information privacy, which can be defined as the ability to control information about oneself [36].”
Understanding Privacy Online: Development of a Social Contract Approach to Privacy (2016, background): “…those privacy expectations with their customers regardless of the 3 This negotiation over privacy norms is not synonymous with privacy as a commodity (Smith et al. 2011), a privacy calculus (Culnan and Armstrong 1999; Dinev and Hart 2006), or a second exchange (Culnan and Bies 2003), all of which…”
Privacy in the Digital Age: A Review of Information Privacy Research in Information Systems (2011, background): “In addition to the individual, group, and organizational levels that Skinner et al. propose, we also include a societal level to capture information privacy that is studied within or across national or cultural regions, as proposed by Smith et al. (2011).”
"My Data Just Goes Everywhere: " User Mental Models of the Internet and Implications for Privacy and Security (2015, background): “A more recent 2011 review of the literature suggests that people's awareness of organizations collecting their personal information increases their privacy concerns [35], but there remains little understanding of how people think the Internet works.”
Blissfully ignorant: the effects of general privacy concerns, general institutional trust, and affect in the privacy calculus (2015, background): “While many prior studies have used privacy concerns as a ‘proxy to privacy’ (Smith et al., 2011), a conceptualization of privacy as a state emphasizes the contextual and situational nature of privacy beliefs.”