Test Accommodations for Students With Disabilities: An Analysis of the Interaction Hypothesis
By S. Sireci, Stan Scarpati, Shuhong Li. 2005
314 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education, Management Science and Operations Research, Safety Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c1aa189cf3045f590b1289beb505e9e88e7cfe65
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- Batya Elbaum
- Nicole Haag
- Leanne Ketterlin-Geller
- Alexander Roppelt
- Birgit Heppt
- Petra Stanat
- Gerald A. Tindal
- G. Lindsay
In Management Science and Operations Research
In Safety Research
- Batya Elbaum
- Nicole Haag
- Leanne Ketterlin-Geller
- Judith R. Harrison
- Alexander Roppelt
- Birgit Heppt
- Petra Stanat
- Nora Bunford
Citations in the corpus
- Educational Accommodations for Students With Behavioral Challenges (2013, methodology): “Studies on the use of testing accommodations (see reviews by Cormier, Altman, Shyyan, & Thurlow, 2010; Sireci et al., 2005; Tindal & Fuchs, 2000) include students with any disability and thus do not inform us about the effectiveness of accommodations specifically for students with EBDs or ADHD.”
- Developing a New Paradigm for Conducting Research on Accommodations in Mathematics Testing (2007, background): “The read-aloud accommodation is a verbatim oral presentation of test items and has been demonstrated to improve the validity of score-based interpretations for students with disabilities on mathematics tests (Sireci et al., 2005).”
- Effects of an Oral Testing Accommodation on the Mathematics Performance of Secondary Students With and Without Learning Disabilities (2007, methodology): “This study implemented several recommendations in the literature (see Helwig & Tindal, 2003; Sireci et al., 2005).”
- Linguistic simplification of mathematics items: effects for language minority students in Germany (2015, background): “Based on the differential boost and interaction hypotheses (Fuchs et al. 2000; Koenig and Bachman 2004; Sireci et al. 2005), we expect the linguistically simplified items to be easier than the original items and we predict this effect to be more pronounced for second-language learners than for nativ”