A Review of Three Decades of Doctoral Studies Using the Principal Instructional Management Rating Scale: A Lens on Methodological Progress in Educational Leadership
By Philip Hallinger. 2011
313 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education, Information Systems and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c0fc53201d01cd4472c7d691daba89b10bada9e3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- A. Kılınç
- Mahmut Polatcan
- M. Bellibaş
- Phillip Hallinger
- Temel Çalık
- Russ Marion
- Ferudun Sezgin
- Hasan Kavgacı
In Information Systems and Management
- Phillip Hallinger
- Russ Marion
- A. Kılınç
- Xiaorong Ma
- M. Bellibaş
- Alex J. Bowers
- Wen-Chung Wang
- Chia‐Wen Chen
Citations in the corpus
- Assessing the Measurement Properties of the Principal Instructional Management Rating Scale (2013, methodology): “Numerous scholars and practitioners have noted that features of the school context may shape or moderate the leadership behavior of principals (e.g., Belchetz & Leithwood, 2007; Goldring, Huff, May, & Camburn, 2008; Hallinger, 2011a).”
- Conceptual and methodological issues in studying school leadership effects as a reciprocal process (2011, unknown): “…of cross-sectional snapshots of school processes in school leadership research has led scholars to propose alternative ways of understanding how leadership might impact learning (Hallinger & Heck, 1996a, 1996b, 2010; Heck & Hallinger, 2010; Mulford & Silins, 2003; Pitner, 1988; Southworth, 2002).”
- Exploring how instructional leadership affects teacher efficacy: A multilevel analysis (2021, background): “In the future, more longitudinal, experimental, or quasi-experimental studies need to be conducted (Hallinger, 2011; Shamir, 2011).”
- Linking instructional leadership to teacher practices: The mediating effect of shared practice and agency in learning effectiveness (2020, methodology): “Besides, the PIL scale was also filled out by teachers, eliminating the subjectivity of leadership self-reported data, since principals are often inclined to overestimate their own leadership practices (Hallinger, 2011).”
- Toward an Evolving Conceptualization of Instructional Leadership as Leadership for Learning: Meta-narrative Review of 109 Quantitative Studies across 25 Years. (2017, methodology): “…(Hallinger andMurphy, 1985) can be seen in the large number of studies using instructional leadership as their theoretical Journal of Educational Administration Vol. 56 No. 2, 2018 pp. 161-182 © Emerald Publishing Limited 0957-8234 DOI 10.1108/JEA-06-2016-0064 framework (Hallinger, 2005, 2011a).”
- Examination of Relationships between Instructional Leadership of School Principals and Self-Efficacy of Teachers and Collective Teacher Efficacy. (2012, background): “One of them is instructional leadership which has been at issue and studied recently (Hallinger, 2011).”