The role of tacit and explicit knowledge in the workplace
By Elizabeth A. Smith. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2001
1,096 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Human Factors and Ergonomics, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bf0ac74ac7d670568010c170ed1ffa4213efb80c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Human Factors and Ergonomics
- Fytton Rowland
- J. Scott Holste
- Sanjay Kumar Singh
- Dawn R. Schneider
- Susan J. Ashford
- Syed-Ikhsan Syed Omar Sharifuddin
- Claudia Cogliser
- Adam M. Grant
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Adam M. Grant
- Susan J. Ashford
- Sharon K. Parker
- Fytton Rowland
- Demetris Vrontis
- J. Scott Holste
- Sanjay Kumar Singh
- Dawn R. Schneider
In Social Psychology
- Adam M. Grant
- Susan J. Ashford
- Sharon K. Parker
- Fytton Rowland
- Demetris Vrontis
- J. Scott Holste
- Sanjay Kumar Singh
- Dawn R. Schneider
Citations in the corpus
- Trust and tacit knowledge sharing and use (2010, background): “…persuasions, care-why Scott (2000) Transferred through face-to-face interaction, observation, imitation, practice, shared-experiences based on trust Smith (2001) Academic, know-what, print or electronic media, manuals, mathematical expressions, copyrights, patents Practical, action-oriented,…”
- A conceptual model of knowledge sharing (2018, background): “According to Smith (2001), 90 per cent of the knowledge in firm is embedded and synthesized in people’s heads which is inseparable.”
- Knowledge management in a public organization: a study on the relationship between organizational elements and the performance of knowledge transfer (2004, background): “Rubenstein-Montano et al. (2001a, p. 13) and Smith (2001, p. 313) argue that people possess different types of tacit and explicit knowledgè`there should be a distinction between tacit and explicit knowledge'' as``each needs to be handled appropriately'' (Rubenstein-Montano et al., 2001a, p. 13).”
- The dynamics of proactivity at work (2008, background): “As such, much of the knowledge about how to carry out these behaviors is likely to be tacit (e.g., Berman, Down, & Hill, 2002; Gerwin & Ferris, 2004; Smith, 2001; Sternberg & Horvath, 1999; Wagner & Sternberg, 1985), picked up through observation and experience but never explicitly communicated.”
- Identifying 21st Century STEM Competencies Using Workplace Data (2015, background): “ and prioritize important work. In addition to timing and budget, knowledge must also be managed. In a knowledge-based economy, the ability to acquire and manage knowledge is the hallmark of success (Smith 2001). Individuals without adequate knowledge, education, and training, struggle to keep up. A”
- Understanding and Measuring Autonomy: An Entrepreneurial Orientation Perspective (2009, positive): “The level of autonomy a team possesses has been positively related to effective knowledge management, such that higher levels of autonomy facilitate knowledge creation, transfer, and application (Janz & Prasarnphanich, 2005; Smith, 2001).”
- Role of leadership in knowledge management: a study (2008, background): “Stewart (1997) also asserts that even companies with promising cultures and highly effective incentive programs will not succeed without having dedicated and responsible managers.”
- The Internet of Things: Building a knowledge management system for open innovation and knowledge management capacity (2017, background): “Converting general knowledge into specific knowledge is essential in achieving this (Smith, 2001).”