Perceptions of abusive supervision: The role of subordinates' attribution styles☆

By Mark J. Martinko, Paul Harvey, David M. Sikora, Scott C. Douglas. 2011

180 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bcb714f50036468fd03a4b1f5b71df5916840f74

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Understanding internal, external, and relational attributions for abusive supervision (2014, background): “For instance, Martinko et al. (2011) found that a tendency toward stable attributions exacerbates the relationship between externally based attribution styles and perceptions of abusive supervision.”
Examining the impact of abusive supervision on employees’ psychological wellbeing and turnover intention: The mediating role of intrinsic motivation (2020, background): “Perceived abuse and injustice, stress, conflict are antecedents of abusive supervision indicated by research (M.J. Martinko et al., 2011).”
Antecedents of Abusive Supervision: a Meta-analytic Review (2015, unknown): “In particular, when employees perceive their supervisors’ behavior as being relatively stable (i.e., as trait like aggression), they are more likely to report abusive supervision (Martinko et al. 2011).”
Destructive Leadership: A Critique of Leader-Centric Perspectives and Toward a More Holistic Definition (2016, background): “Further, some people underreport supervisor hostility, while others, such as those with negative affect or a hostile attribution bias, may overstate their exposure (Martinko et al. 2011; Tepper et al. 2006).”
When Victims Help Their Abusive Supervisors: The Role of LMX, Self-Blame, and Guilt (2020, result): “Despite some caution that abusive supervision and LMX may tap into the same implicit leadership theory (Martinko et al., 2011), these results strongly suggest that future studies seem well advised not to equate (episodes of) abusive supervision with low LMX, but instead try to tease apart the…”