Understanding internal, external, and relational attributions for abusive supervision

By James P. Burton, Shannon G. Taylor, Larissa K. Barber. 2014

107 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d3be7bb84c15dbf8844bc52b73d958ff41c838da

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Niels Van Quaquebeke
2. Christian Troester
3. Melissa G. Keith
4. P. D. Harms
5. Louis Tay
6. Michael T. Kalkbrenner
7. Richard P. Bagozzi
8. Steven D. Shaw

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Louis Tay
2. Melissa G. Keith
3. Niels Van Quaquebeke
4. Christian Troester
5. P. D. Harms

Citations in the corpus

• Systems Perspective of Amazon Mechanical Turk for Organizational Research: Review and Recommendations (2017, methodology): “Many MTurk samples were used as pilot tests (e.g., Lin-Healy and Small, 2012; Burton et al., 2014; Nichols and Cottrell, 2014; Spisak et al., 2014; Bhargave et al., 2015; Rosette et al., 2015; Shirako et al., 2015; van Dijke et al., 2015) or for further psychometric work (e.g., McGonagle and…”
• When Victims Help Their Abusive Supervisors: The Role of LMX, Self-Blame, and Guilt (2020, background): “…expressed considerable self-blame, even though, on average, they were more likely to blame their supervisor for the abuse (Bowling & Michel, 2011; Burton et al., 2014; but also see studies by Liao and colleagues (in press) and Liu and colleagues (2012) on injury initiation attribution tendency…”