Examining the Construct Validity of Mastery-Avoidance Achievement Goals: A Meta-Analysis

By Lisa E. Baranik, L. Stanley, Bethany H. Bynum, C. Lance. 2010

202 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bc59ce51b9a037d213b2f0cf374744a752556196

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Performance-Approach Goal Effects Depend on How They Are Defined: Meta-Analytic Evidence From Multiple Educational Outcomes (2017, methodology): “Finally, it is useful to compare the overall effect sizes with those from previous meta-analyses, each of which included unpublished studies and thus should be relatively free of the bias (Baranik et al., 2010; Cellar et al., 2011; Huang, 2011a; Payne et al., 2007).”
A Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Situationally Induced Achievement Goals on Task Performance (2015, background): “The added value of this first meta-analysis on the impact of situationally induced achievement goals on objective performance criteria is particularly high in combination with previous meta-analyses on correlational research on the same topic (Baranik et al., 2010; Bodmann et al., 2007; Hulleman et ”
Transformational and Transactional Leadership and Followers’ Achievement Goals (2013, background): “…goals are the only optimal achievement regulator has been challenged by a quite consistent link between performance goals and performance attainment (e.g., Baranik et al. 2010; Cianci et al. 2010; Hulleman et al. 2010; Payne et al. 2007; Seijts and Crim 2009; Senko et al. 2011; Yeo et al. 2009).”
Trait Goal Orientation, Self-Regulation, and Performance: A Meta-Analysis (2011, background): “Other meta-analyses have focused on the construct validity of the four-factor model ( Baranik et al. 2010 ) and conceptual inconsistencies in the manner in which goal orientations are measured and their influence on outcomes (Hulleman et al. 2010).”