Institutions and inflows of foreign direct investment: a fuzzy-set analysis
By Kalle Pajunen. 2008
315 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Development, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bb3ceae3930246041197e4c86a75ae6c3d359f41
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Development
- Fuming Jiang
- Jasper J. Hotho
- Stav Fainshmidt
- Dionysis Skarmeas
- Ettore Spadafora
- Valentina Marano
- William Q. Judge
- Alicia Mas-Tur
In Sociology and Political Science
- Ruth V. Aguilera
- Donal Crilly
- Igor Filatotchev
- William Q. Judge
- Stav Fainshmidt
- J. Lee Brown III
- A. Rey-Martí
- Ana M Tur Porcar
In Strategy and Management
- Ruth V. Aguilera
- Igor Filatotchev
- Mike Wright
- Mike W. Peng
- Xiaohui Liu
- Jiangyong Lu
- K. Meyer
- Michael A. Hitt
Citations in the corpus
- From Typology to Taxonomy: A Configurational Analysis of National Business Systems and their Explanatory Power (2014, methodology): “While still a relatively new technique, QCA has therefore increasingly been used in analyses of institutional regimes and their outcomes (e.g., Boyer, 2004; Gjølberg, 2009; Jackson, 2005; Kogut & Ragin, 2006; Kvist, 2007; Pajunen, 2008; Schneider et al., 2010).”
- An institutional approach to cross-national distance (2010, methodology): “In this paper, we approach cross-national distance from an institutional perspective so as to capture the rich diversity of ways in which countries differ, thus following recent institutional theorizing in the field of international business (Jackson & Deeg, 2008; Pajunen, 2008).”
- Which model of capitalism best delivers both wealth and equality? (2014, methodology): “Recent articles in pertinent management and international business journals have demonstrated the analytical strengths and usefulness of fsQCA for macro-social and international strategy research (e.g., Crilly, 2010; Fiss, 2011; Pajunen, 2008; Schneider, Schulze-Bentrop, & Paunescu, 2010), especiall”
- The Institutional Influence on the Location Strategies of Multinational Enterprises from Emerging Economies: Evidence from China's Cross-border Mergers and Acquisitions (2016, background): “Thus, it is argued that an institution-based view is needed to explain Chinese cross-border M&As (Child & Marinova, 2014; Meyer et al., 2009; Pajunen, 2008).”
- Home Country Institutions and the Internationalization-Performance Relationship (2016, methodology): “Still, there has been little effort to determine which home country institutions influence the I-P relationship or the mechanisms underlying these effects (Pajunen, 2008: 653).”
- Fuzzy Profiles (2018, background): “Several set-theoretic studies in the strategy domain employ a higher level of analysis than the firm, such as distinct geographic regions within a country (Gilbert & Campbell, 2015) and across multiple countries (Greckhamer, 2011, 2016; Pajunen, 2008; Schneider, Schulze-Bentrop, & Paunescu, 2010).”
- Predicting stakeholder orientation in the multinational enterprise: A mid-range theory (2011, methodology): “In this part of the study I use the entire sample of 52 overseas subsidiaries, consistent with sample sizes in prior fuzzy-set studies (Pajunen, 2008).”
- Corporate governance and financial performance: The role of ownership and board structure (2018, unknown): “Moreover, fsQCA is capable of detecting inconsistent results (Schneider & Wagemann, 2012; Fiss, 2011; Pajunen, 2008; Rey, Galende, Fuente, & Sainz-Palmero, 2017; Woodside, 2013).”
- Does Institutional Reform of Intellectual Property Rights Lead to More Inbound FDI? Evidence from Latin America and the Caribbean (2011, unknown): “Specifically, to embark on FDI strategies and reconcile contracts that support investment, MNEs must account for the institutional differences between host and home countries (Brouthers, 2002; Farashahi & Hafsi, 2009; Kuemmerle, 1999; Pajunen, 2008).”
- Exploring the relationship between institutional factors and FDI attractiveness: A meta-analytic review (2018, result): “Where there is overlap, both Loree and Guisinger (1995) and Woodward and Rolfe (1993) find similar results, while in Campos and 1 Similar factor lists are found in well-cited articles such as Globerman and Shapiro (2003) and Pajunen (2008).”
- Convergence of Accounting Standards and Foreign Direct Investment (2014, methodology): “11 The gravity model was first used to account for bilateral trade flows in the original research by Tinbergen (1962). It has been applied to bilateral FDI flows in both the economics literature (Eaton and Tamura, 1994) and the management literature (Habib and Zurawicki, 2002).”
- Examining the role of CSR skepticism using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (2014, methodology): “…the technique 10 in business and management are fewer, though representative examples are available in areas such as international business (e.g., Pajunen, 2008; Schneider, SchulzeBentrop, & Paunescu, 2010), innovation (e.g., Cheng, Chang, & Li, 2013; Ganter & Hecker, 2013; Stanko & Olleros,…”
- Returnee entrepreneurs, knowledge spillovers and innovation in high-tech firms in emerging economies (2010, background): “Our finding indicates that there is complementary between cross-border and inter-firm human mobility, consistent with important set-theoretic research suggesting knowledge transfer and utilization as a system of interrelated elements with strategic complementarities (Fiss, 2007; Grandori & Furnari, ”
- The Interrelationships Among Informal Institutions, Formal Institutions, and Inward Foreign Direct Investment (2013, unknown): “In light of “[t]he popular assumption . . . that political stability of a country is conducive to FDI inflows” (Pajunen, 2008: 654; also see Chan & Makino, 2007, and Loree & Guisinger, 1995), our results showing a negative relationship between more democratic political 556 Journal of Management /…”
- Corruption, South African Multinational Enterprises and Institutions in Africa (2014, background): “Indeed institutional voids in host countries are seen by many as a primary cause of pervasive bureaucratic and organisational corruption (Pajunen 2008).”