From Typology to Taxonomy: A Configurational Analysis of National Business Systems and their Explanatory Power

By Jasper J. Hotho. 2014

116 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1a9ef87fe39635145e21e5a6ea028e85188e14cc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Ruth V. Aguilera
2. Stav Fainshmidt
3. William Q. Judge
4. Adam Smith
5. Ilya Okhmatovskiy
6. Jonathan P. Doh
7. Aldo Musacchio
8. G. Wood

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Ruth V. Aguilera
2. Stav Fainshmidt
3. William Q. Judge
4. Adam Smith
5. Jonathan P. Doh
6. Aldo Musacchio
7. G. Wood
8. Mike Wright

In Strategy and Management

1. Ruth V. Aguilera
2. Jonathan P. Doh
3. Aldo Musacchio
4. Mike Wright
5. William Q. Judge
6. Stav Fainshmidt
7. Adam Smith
8. Ilya Okhmatovskiy

Citations in the corpus

• State capitalism in international context: Varieties and variations (2020, background): “…groupings are usually identified using hierarchical clustering in which researchers provide a qualitative description that captures distinctive characteristics of each cluster (e.g., Carney, Estrin, Liang, & Shapiro, 2019; Fainshmidt, Judge, Aguilera, & Smith, 2018; Hotho, 2014; Witt et al., 2018).”
• Varieties of institutional systems: A contextual taxonomy of understudied countries (2016, methodology): “…have proven useful in explaining the nature and consequences of systemic variation, especially in developed economies (e.g., Witt & Redding, 2013; Hotho, 2014; Schneider & Paunescu, 2012), they are often not wellsuited for characterizing the increasingly significant group of newly-developed,…”