Does Institutional Reform of Intellectual Property Rights Lead to More Inbound FDI? Evidence from Latin America and the Caribbean

By Theodore A. Khoury, Mike W. Peng. 2011

143 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fa86ddc5de0fd26b815d58330decf989e169bd19

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Mike W. Peng
2. Igor Filatotchev
3. Mike Wright
4. K. Meyer
5. R. Hoskisson
6. Sunny Li Sun
7. D. Ahlstrom
8. Garry D. Bruton

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Mike Wright
2. Mike W. Peng
3. K. Meyer
4. Igor Filatotchev
5. R. Hoskisson
6. Sunny Li Sun
7. N. Bailey
8. W. Shi

In Strategy and Management

1. Mike W. Peng
2. Mike Wright
3. K. Meyer
4. Igor Filatotchev
5. Sunny Li Sun
6. R. Hoskisson
7. W. Shi
8. D. Ahlstrom

Citations in the corpus

• Domestic alliance network to attract foreign partners: Evidence from international joint ventures in China (2014, background): “In our two industries characterized by rapid innovation , a local firm's capabilities of innovation are important (Khoury & Peng, 2011; Nielsen, 2003) and may affect the formation of IJVs.”
• Entrepreneurship Amid Concurrent Institutional Constraints in Less Developed Countries (2016, background): “Thus, with ineffective or corrupt governance systems and lacking property rights regimes within LDCs, formal institutions fail to promote enterprise (Aghion et al., 2010; Khoury & Peng, 2011; La Porta, Lopez-de-Silanes, Schleifer, & Vishny, 1999).”
• Exploring the relationship between institutional factors and FDI attractiveness: A meta-analytic review (2018, background): “Market supporting institutions are similarly beneficial because they allow efficiency-seeking investors to realize cost-saving benefits of internalizing production (Meyer & Nguyen, 2005) and protect intellectual property from being appropriated (Khoury & Peng, 2011).”
• The global strategy of emerging multinationals from China (2012, unknown): “The role of host country governments has attracted significant research attention (Khoury and Peng, 2011; Meyer et al., 2009).”
• Institutional open access at home and outward internationalization (2015, background): “It leads to some meager innovations and technology transfers (Khoury & Peng, 2011).”
• Emerging multinationals from mid-range economies: the influence of institutions and factor markets (2013, methodology): “This research has culminated in a new institution-based view that features prominently in the strategy and international business (IB) literature (Ahuja and Yayavaram, 2011; Dunning and Lundan, 2008; Khoury and Peng, 2011; Kim et al., 2010; Meyer et al., 2009a; Peng et al., 2008, 2009).”
• An institution-based view of global IPR history (2017, background): “The interest of a domestic stakeholder group increasingly coincides with the foreign interest in better IPR protection and harmonization of laws (Khoury & Peng, 2011; Lewin et al., 2016).”
• Business under adverse home country institutions: The case of international sanctions against Myanmar (2020, background): “…emerging ones, that constrain the operations of foreign entrants through institutional voids (Khanna & Palepu, 1999), high transaction costs (Meyer et al. 2009), weak intellectual property rights protection (Khoury & Peng, 2011) or high uncertainty (Delios & Henisz, 2003; Brouthers et al. 2002).”