Group cohesion: From "field of forces" to multidimensional construct.

By K. Dion. 2000

343 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Economics and Econometrics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b975f21eae2f8e89b2dc970800a3f02191cbb9bd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Social Projection to Ingroups and Outgroups: A Review and Meta-Analysis (2005, neutral): “People are more likely to perceive these attributes in ingroups than in outgroups ( see Dion , 2000 , or Jackson & Smith , 1999 , for reviews ) , and social pro - jection may be a mediating factor .”
Group Climate, Cohesion, Alliance, and Empathy in Group Psychotherapy: Multilevel Structural Equation Models. (2005, background): “Although some empirical work (Dion, 2000) has supported such distinctions among therapeutic relationships based on roles, at least some of these distinctions seem to also have arisen from historical differences among theories.”
Transformational Leadership, Cohesion Perceptions, and Employee Cynicism About Organizational Change (2007, background): “…defined as the group members’ tendency to stay with the group or a larger social entity (Bollen & Hoyle, 1990; Dion, 2000), researchers also recognize that it is individuals’ unique experience that contributes to their own perception of group cohesion (Dion, 2000; Podsakoff & MacKenzie, 1995).”
Core Challenges of Social Robot Navigation: A Survey (2021, methodology): “[176] ✓ Dion [46] ✓ Lewin [134] ✓ Karamouzas et al.”
Team Dynamics: A Social Network Perspective (2012, background): “As Dion (2000) notes, understanding vertical cohesion in addition to the more traditionally measured horizontal cohesion could provide a more comprehensive assessment of a group's overall cohesion.”
The Nature and Consequences of Group Cohesion in a Military Sample (2007, background): “A number of meta-analyses indicate that cohesion is a determinant of job performance (Evans & Dion, 1991; Mullen & Cooper, 1994). Oliver et al.’s (1999) recent meta-analysis confirmed that cohesion was predictive of performance in military contexts, more strongly so for group performance than for in”
The social psychology of perceived prejudice and discrimination. (2002, background): “However, since outgroup threat usually heightens own group identification ( Dion, 1979, 2000 ), another predictable consequence or correlate of perceived prejudice and discrimination should be increased identification with one's own group - the counterpart in the individual to greater cohesion in th”
A Three-Factor Model of Social Identity (2004, background): “Although cohesion has been conceptualized and assessed in a number of ways (see Dion, 2000, and Hogg, 1992, for reviews), one relevant distinction is between measures that take a group-level approach and those directed at capturing individual-level perceptions of the extent to which one feels bound…”
Assessing Workgroup Norms for Civility: The Development of the Civility Norms Questionnaire-Brief (2012, background): “…constructs that arguably extend beyond the boundaries of the construct of civility climate, including teamwork (which is akin to workgroup cohesion; Dion, 2000), acceptance of diversity, and organizational tolerance of discrimination (which are similar to diversity climate; Hicks-Clarke & Iles,…”
A Longitudinal Study of Team Conflict, Conflict Management, Cohesion, and Team Effectiveness (2009, background): “Andrews, Kacmar, Blakely, & Bucklew, 2008; Dion, 2000; Lewin, Lippitt, & White, 1939). In keeping with Carron, Brawley, and Widmeyer (1998), however, we define cohesion more specifically as the tendency for a group to stick together and remain united in the pursuit of its instrumental objectives.”
Leadership and Team Cohesiveness Across Cultures (2009, methodology): “…(Jehn & Mannix, 2001; Nibler & Harris, 2003), and improved performance at the individual level (Chang & Bordia, 2001; Langfred, 1998), and at the team level (Dion, 2000; Mullen & Copper, 1994; Shields & Gardner, 1997), as well as with innovation in teams and organizations (Mumford & Hunter, 2005).”