Student perceptions of continuous summative assessment

155 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

An assessment arms race and its fallout: high-stakes grading and the case for slow scholarship (2015, background): “A series of small discrete assignments can be brought together at the end of a course (Trotter 2006; Winter 2003), and the data showed that some subjects, for example, languages, require small regular tests.”
Enhancing the early student experience (2006, unknown): “This approach is consistent with the more recent findings of Trotter (2006) and in the findings of this study.”
Assessment revisited: a review of research in Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education (2016, methodology): “The use of continuous summative assessment in the form of tutorial files is positive, and the students had the opportunity to learn more about the topic and to articulate their knowledge (Trotter 2006).”