Executive Function and Reading Comprehension: A Meta-Analytic Review

By D. Follmer. 2018

273 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b78d369f6abe617f40daf79eee699f84b874c6ac

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Terrill O. Taylor
2. Surjya Bajpayee
3. Nell K. Duke
4. Virginia Clinton
5. Sarah E. Carlson
6. Mark L. Davison
7. Kelly B. Cartwright
8. Ben Seipel

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Terrill O. Taylor
2. Surjya Bajpayee
3. Nell K. Duke
4. Virginia Clinton
5. Sarah E. Carlson
6. Mark L. Davison
7. Kelly B. Cartwright
8. Ben Seipel

In Psychiatry and Mental health

1. Terrill O. Taylor
2. Surjya Bajpayee
3. Nell K. Duke
4. Virginia Clinton
5. Sarah E. Carlson
6. Mark L. Davison
7. Kelly B. Cartwright
8. Ben Seipel

Citations in the corpus

• The Science of Reading Progresses: Communicating Advances Beyond the Simple View of Reading (2021, background): “In recent years, EFs have been the subject of an enormous amount of scientific research in relation to reading (for reviews, see Butterfuss & Kendeou, 2018; Cartwright, 2015; Follmer, 2018).”
• Inferential comprehension differences between narrative and expository texts: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2020, methodology): “The descriptive information was coded and double coded by the first author with a research assistant independently coding 25% (see Follmer, 2018, for similar approach; κ = .80).. 1 3”