Virginia Clinton

Developmental and Educational Psychology · 2019–2020

A researcher in the Science corpus: 2 papers; trusts 6 researchers and is trusted by 1 researcher here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Virginia Clinton trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Amy M. Elleman
  2. D. Follmer
  3. A. Graesser
  4. K. Cain
  5. Danielle S. McNamara
  6. Julian P. T. Higgins
  7. Claes Wohlin
  8. David B. Daniel
  9. D. Gardner
  10. Jane Oakhill

Who trusts Virginia Clinton overall

  1. Marc Brysbaert

Papers from Virginia Clinton's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Virginia Clinton trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Vocabulary input through extensive reading: A comparison of words found in children's narrative and expository reading materials
  2. Individual Differences in the Inference of Word Meanings From Context: The Influence of Reading Comprehension, Vocabulary Knowledge, and Memory Capacity.
  3. Examining the Impact of Inference Instruction on the Literal and Inferential Comprehension of Skilled and Less Skilled Readers: A Meta-Analytic Review
  4. Executive Function and Reading Comprehension: A Meta-Analytic Review
  5. Matthew Effects in Reading: Some Consequences of Individual Differences in the Acquisition of Literacy
  6. Practical Meta-Analysis
  7. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.)
  8. Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension.
  9. SERT: Self-Explanation Reading Training
  10. Statistical Methods for Meta‐Analysis

Their papers