Taking a Closer Look at Science Teaching Orientations.

By Patrica Friedrichsen, J. V. van Driel, Sandra K. Abell. 2011

301 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b75822d8a3ee908d573eacc87b1ec3c375d64eab

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Patrick L. Brown
2. Patricia J. Friedrichsen
3. Erik Barendsen
4. Ineke Henze
5. D. Hanuscin
6. Sandra K. Abell

In Education

1. D. Hanuscin
2. Patricia J. Friedrichsen
3. Patrick L. Brown
4. Erik Barendsen
5. Ineke Henze
6. Sandra K. Abell
7. Elizabeth A. Davis
8. B. Crawford

Citations in the corpus

• The Development of Prospective Secondary Biology Teachers PCK (2013, methodology): “Friedrichsen et al. (2011) reviewed the literature on teacher beliefs and science teaching orientations, and recommended that science teacher orientations focus on beliefs about the role of the teacher, the role of the student, views about science, and goals or purposes for teaching science.”
• Relating Teacher PCK and Teacher Practice Using Classroom Observation (2017, background): “Indeed, our teacher might have such a traditional underlying (but concealed) orientation towards teaching science (Friedrichsen et al. 2011; Magnusson et al. 1999).”
• Critical Incidents in the Development of Pedagogical Content Knowledge for Teaching the Nature of Science: A Prospective Elementary Teacher’s Journey (2013, background): “Jane’s goal for teaching NOS was to encourage all students to view science as an endeavor in which they could participate, which reflects a student-centered orientation toward science teaching (Friedrichsen et al. 2011).”