Teachers’ personal epistemological beliefs about students with disabilities as indicators of effective teaching practices
By Anne Jordan, P. Stanovich. 2003
149 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b357970cc04bd54c31fefeadeca159f4357c23f1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Helenrose Fives
- Michelle Buehl
- R. Berry
- Nathan D. Jones
- Mary T. Brownell
- Ivar Bråten
- B. Hofer
- Jeffrey Alan Greene
In Education
- Helenrose Fives
- Michelle Buehl
- R. Berry
- Nathan D. Jones
- Mary T. Brownell
- Ivar Bråten
- B. Hofer
- Jeffrey Alan Greene
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- What do teachers believe? Developing a framework for examining beliefs about teachers’ knowledge and ability (2008, background): “…Givvin, Salmon, & MacGyvers, 2001; constructivism: Holt-Reynolds, 2000; instructional practices: Borko, Davinroy, Bliem, & Cumbo, 2000; diversity: McAllister & Irvine, 2002; bilingual education: Johnson, 2000; special education: Jordan & Stanovich, 2003; and urban education: Roderick, 1994).”
- PRESERVICE AND EARLY CAREER TEACHERS' ATTITUDES TOWARD INCLUSION, INSTRUCTIONAL ACCOMMODATIONS, AND FAIRNESS: THREE PROFILES (2010, background): “Teachers bring particular epistemological beliefs and theories to bear on their teaching practices ( Lipson, Mosenthal, Daniels, & Woodside-Jiron, 2000 ; Pajares, 1993 ), and this is no less true for inclusion classrooms ( Berry, 2006 ; Jordan & Stanovich, 2003 ).”
- Examining the Use of Classroom Observations in the Evaluation of Special Education Teachers (2014, methodology): “In Kane’s (2006) argument-based model of validation, one specifies both an interpretive argument and a validity argument to evaluate the interpretive argument.”