First Courses in Statistical Science: The Status of Educational Reform Efforts

By Joan Garfield, Bob Hogg, C. Schau, D. Whittinghill. 2002

207 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Over the past twenty years much has been written about the introductory or service course in statistics. Historically, this course has been viewed as difficult and unpleasant by many students and frustrating and unrewarding to teach by many instructors. Dissatisfactions with the introductory course have led people to suggest new models for the course, to lead workshops to reexamine this course (Hogg 1992), and to offer recommendations for how the course should be changed (Cobb 1992). This paper presents the results of a survey of teachers of the first statistics course, to determine the impact of reform efforts on the teaching of statistics. Suggestions and guidelines for teaching these courses are offered, based on the results of the survey.

Subfields: Education, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b19449b2ecdcb3e3f8d1583f205c1b5f37055f1a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

  1. R. Hassad
  2. Dani Ben-Zvi
  3. Taylor W. Acee
  4. C. Weinstein
  5. Ruth Beyth-Marom
  6. Geoff Cumming
  7. Fiona Fidler
  8. Z. Libman

In Statistics and Probability

  1. R. Hassad
  2. Fiona Fidler
  3. Dani Ben-Zvi
  4. Geoff Cumming
  5. Ruth Beyth-Marom
  6. Joan Garfield
  7. Z. Libman
  8. Taylor W. Acee

Citations in the corpus