Presenteeism as a global phenomenon: unraveling the psychosocial mechanisms from the perspective of social cognitive theory

By Cary L. Cooper, Luo Lu. 2016

86 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/afa2c861fb95226d5ac7bf5141a229e99027481f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

1. M. Karanika-Murray
2. C. Biron
3. C. Dietz
4. Aristides I. Ferreira
5. Luis F. Martinez
6. G. Johns
7. K. Nielsen

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. M. Karanika-Murray
2. C. Biron
3. Luis F. Martinez
4. Aristides I. Ferreira
5. Stig Vinberg
6. Mariella Miraglia
7. H. Breitsohl
8. G. Johns

Citations in the corpus

• The health-performance framework of presenteeism: Towards understanding an adaptive behaviour (2020, background): “In line with this is the call by Cooper and Lu (2016) for more research attempting to ‘unravel the central, dynamic processes and mechanisms through which people ascribe meanings to the situation, make decisions to come to work when ill, and attempt to achieve performance outcomes’ (2016: 226).”
• “To work, or not to work, that is the question” – Recent trends and avenues for research on presenteeism (2020, background): “Cooper defined presenteeism as being physically present but functionally absent (Cooper, 1996; Cooper & Lu, 2016), which is not strictly confined to illness.”