Effect of Information Systems Resources and Capabilities on Firm Performance: A Resource-Based Perspective

By T. Ravichandran, Chalermsak Lertwongsatien. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2005

1,370 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Information Systems

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/af2d4b34e8cdf94d6fb1363c88d3b8ac633f415e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Information Systems

Citations in the corpus

Resource Structuring or Capability Building? An Empirical Study of the Business Value of Information Technology (2012, methodology): “Following Ravichandran and Lertwongsatien [88], firm performance is defined as a firm’s performance consisting of the operational dimension and the market dimension.”
Understanding the Link Between Information Technology Capability and Organizational Agility: An Empirical Examination (2011, background): “, Ravichandran and Lertwongsatien 2005 ) or manufacturing firms ( e . g .”
The impact of business analytics on supply chain performance (2010, neutral): “The proposed moderating effect is in line with the finding that IS investment influences performance through IS support for core competencies [64], in our case competencies in each of the four areas of SCOR.”
How can SMEs successfully navigate VUCA environment: The role of agility in the digital transformation era (2022, result): “Consistent with prior studies (Armstrong and Sambamurthy, 1999; Duncan, 1995; Ravichandran, 2018; Ravichandran and Lertwongsatien, 2005), the first dimension was measured using a five-item scale.”
Exploring the relationship between big data analytics capability and competitive performance: The mediating roles of dynamic and operational capabilities (2020, background): “The IT capability literature recognizes that the ability to mobilize and deploy IT-based resources can be a source of a competitive advantage and differentiate firms for competition [28].”
How Does IT Ambidexterity Impact Organizational Agility? (2015, background): “…methodologies) (Nambisan et al. 1999) • IT exploitation capability: An ability to utilize existing IT resources and practices (Atuahene-Gima 2005, Ravichandran and Lertwongsatien 2005) Operational ambidexterity Operational ambidexterity is the ability of a firm to continually innovate and…”
Understanding the influence of information systems competencies on process innovation: A resource-based view (2007, background): “…as ‘‘success in electronic commerce’’ (Montealegre, 2002), ‘‘organi-zational performance’’ (Peppard and Ward, 2004), ‘‘customer service excellence’’ (Ray et al., 2004), ‘‘competitive advantage’’ (Bhatt and Grover, 2005) and ‘‘support for core competencies’’ Ravichandran and Lertwongsatien (2005).”
Inside the adaptive enterprise: an information technology capabilities perspective on business process agility (2008, background): “Ravichandran and Lertwongsatien [47] offer empirical evidence to show that these three types of IT capabilities impact firm performance.”
Revisiting IS business value research: what we already know, what we still need to know, and how we can get there (2013, background): “Chari et al , 2008, Dos Santos et al , 1996, Floyd & Wooldridge, 1990, Li & Ye, 1999, Ravichandran & Lertwongsatien, 2005 (1) Industry factors and (2) macro-economic factors are addressed only rarely.”
Big data analytics capabilities: a systematic literature review and research agenda (2017, methodology): “This classiﬁcation has been predominantly followed in the IS capability literature (Bharadwaj 2000; Aral and Weill 2007; Ravichandran and Lertwongsatien 2005).”
The Formation and Value of IT-Enabled Resources: Antecedents and Consequences of Synergistic Relationships (2010, background): “We note that while some IT assets are customizable, and as such may not be regarded as completely undifferentiated, they are still considered commodities since they are not protected by isolating mechanisms (Ray et al. 2005).”