A New Perspective on Method Variance: A Measure-Centric Approach

269 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The turn to employees in the measurement of human resource practices: A critical review and proposed way forward (2019, methodology): “As argued by Spector et al. (2019), CMV does not arise simply as a result of the nature of the method used (e.g., self‐report items). Rather, it “represents extraneous and unintended systematic influences on a measured variable, some of which may be shared with other measured variables” (p. 856). He”
The Effect of Transformational Leadership on Employees During Organizational Change – An Empirical Analysis (2019, background): “So far, it is not entirely clear how the problems of CMB or UMV harm results or how these problems can be resolved (Spector et al., 2017), so the results may contain a bias caused by method variance.”
Common method bias in applied settings: The dilemma of researching in organizations (2020, background): “Despite CMB being a well-known problem, particularly in survey research, the topic is still of interest and considered an ongoing concern (e.g. Antonakis, 2017; Podsakoff et al., 2012; Spector et al., 2019).”