Contexts of Accountability Under Systemic Reform: Implications for Principal Influence on Instruction and Supervision

149 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Rethinking Instructional Leadership, a Review (2013, background): “In fact, various accountability contexts have been found to support or constrain the influence of the principal on instructional and supervisory decisions (Marks & Nance, 2007).”
The Leadership Teachers Want from Principals: Transformational (2013, background): “Understanding the role of collaboration is essential for implementing change, and transformational principals are best equipped to address these issues (Marks & Nance, 2007).”
Principals' influence on instructional quality: insights from US schools (2010, methodology): “The first of the quantitative studies makes use of Principals' responses to queries regarding their personal influence and the influence of various other stakeholders on decisions in the instructional and supervisory domains in their schools (Marks and Nance 2007 ).”
What Are the Different Types of Principals Across the United States? A Latent Class Analysis of Principal Perception of Leadership (2014, methodology): “We know from previous research the extent of the relationship, dimensionality, and reliability of scales of the 1999-2000 SASS survey items and, specifically, these principal perceptions of leadership variables (e.g., Marks & Nance, 2007; Ware & Kitsantas, 2007, 2011; Wolfe, Ray, & Harris, 2004).”