Differences in the Development of Creative Competencies in Children Schooled in Diverse Learning Environments.

By M. Besançon, Todd Lubart. 2008

170 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Visual Arts and Performing Arts

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ae59d3a1ab84f45b5bf78cf8bc4eb4ca5ac8a4d0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

In Visual Arts and Performing Arts

Citations in the corpus

Developmental Trends of Creativity: What Twists of Turn Do Boys and Girls Take at Different Grades? (2010, background): “This instability could be further complicated by the second phenomenon of small sample size in most studies: e.g., 211 students of grade 1 to 5 (Besançon & Lubart, 2008), 117 students of grade 3 to 5 (Charles & Runco, 2000–2001), 25 students of grade 4 to 9 (Claxton et al., 2005), 22 students of…”
The generality-specificity of creativity: Exploring the structure of creative potential with EPoC (2016, methodology): “For instance, due to the different nature of tasks used, it seems reasonable to observe different developmental patterns as a function of the task used as indicator of the creative potential (Barbot et al., 2016; Besançon & Lubart, 2008).”
Creative Learning Environments in Education--A Systematic Literature Review. (2013, background): “In this study, children attending Montessori schools showed greater originality in thinking than those in other types of primary school (Besancon & Lubart, 2008 ).”
Creative potential in educational settings: its nature, measure, and nurture (2015, background): “For example, in multiple cultures, alternative pedagogies such as Montessori and Freinet lead to higher creative potential in students compared to those exposed to traditional pedagogy (Allodi 2010; Besançon and Lubart 2008; Besançon, Lubart, and Barbot 2013; Heise, Böhme, and Körner 2010).”
From STEM to STEAM: How to Monitor Creativity (2018, background): “Besançon and Lubart (2008) reported diverse studies supporting the hypothesis that women are considered more creative (e.g., Ülger & Morsünbül, 2016); others claim the same for men (e.g., Shin, Jung, Choe, & Han, 2002) or even deny that there are differences (e.g., Besançon & Lubart, 2008).”
Approaches to Measuring Creativity: A Systematic Literature Review (2017, background): “…to study the effects of environmental factors on creativity at the individual (e.g. Amabile, Schatzel, Moneta, Kramer, & 2004; Forrester & Hui, 2007), organizational (e.g. Besançon & Lubart, 2008; Thomas & Berk, 1981) or cultural level (e.g. Leung, Maddux, Galinsky, & Chiu, 2008; Rudowicz, 2003).”