Creative potential in educational settings: its nature, measure, and nurture
By Baptiste Barbot, M. Besançon, Todd Lubart. 2015
163 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f626d5e27491ecc375e9e759cd280cdd6c531569
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Baptiste Barbot
- Maciej Karwowski
- M. Besançon
- A. Gajda
- Todd Lubart
- R. Beghetto
- Franz Xaver Bogner
- Cathérine Conradty
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Maciej Karwowski
- Baptiste Barbot
- R. Beghetto
- A. Gajda
- M. Besançon
- Todd Lubart
- James C. Kaufman
- Franz Xaver Bogner
Citations in the corpus
- The generality-specificity of creativity: Exploring the structure of creative potential with EPoC (2016, background): “In relatedwork (Barbot, Besançon & Lubart, 2015; Barbot & Tinio, 2015; Barbot et al., 2011, 2016; Lubart, Besançon, & Barbot, 2011; Lubart, Zenasni, & Barbot, 2013), we have posited that there is a similar set of skills and traits that lead to creative performance in each domain, but their optimal…”
- From STEM to STEAM: Cracking the Code? How Creativity & Motivation Interacts with Inquiry-based Learning (2019, background): “School-environment is assumed to provide both, to encourage children to be more creative - and also to discourage (Barbot et al., 2015).”
- Creativity and Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis (2017, background): “As such, future research should focus on developing and testing measures of creativity that more adequately represent the creative combination of divergent and convergent thinking (see Barbot et al., 2015; Lubart & Besançon, in press).”