Strategy Instruction and the Teaching of Writing: A Meta-Analysis.
By Steve Graham. 2006
443 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/acc02b47bdd280b9b2dbf7de8e90d77ea2c17195
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Steve Graham
- K. Harris
- Teresa Limpo
- Rui Alexandre Alves
- Natalie G. Olinghouse
- L. Mason
- Richard E. Mayer
- Dolores Perin
Citations in the corpus
- Writing Into the 21st Century (2006, background): “Research on writing in special education with a focus on cognitive strategies instruction has been comprehensively reviewed in Graham (2006), Singer and Bashir (2004), and Wong and Berninger (2004). Graham’s (2006) meta-analysis emulates Hillocks’s (1984) work insofar as the effect sizes in experime”
- Primary Grade Writing Instruction: A National Survey. (2008, background): “At school, their grades are likely to suffer, especially in classes where written tests and reports are the primary means for assessing progress (Graham, 2006b).”
- Common Core State Standards, Writing, and Students with LD: Recommendations (2013, methodology): “…our understanding of how writing develops is not complete, but we know enough to be certain that the road from novice to competent writer is influenced by the context in which writing takes place and changes in students’ writing skills, strategies, knowledge, and motivation (Graham, 2006a).”
- A Meta-Analysis of Writing Interventions for Students With Learning Disabilities (2014, background): “These findings are similar to those obtained in other meta-analyses examining strategy instruction in studies conducted with a broad range of students (Graham, 2006; Graham & Harris, 2003; Graham et al., in press).”
- Qualities of Historical Writing Instruction: A Comparative Case Study of Two Teachers’ Practices (2008, background): “, 2001) and writing (Graham, 2005), as well as feedback strategies such as writing conferences (Sperling, 1990).”
- Application of the percentage of non-overlapping data (PND) in systematic reviews and meta-analyses: A systematic review of reporting characteristics (2008, methodology): “When aggregation was implemented, only 10 systematic reviews used the median PND; all others (with the exception of Rogers and Graham (in press), which used both median and mean), used the mean. Scruggs, Mastropieri, Cook, and Escobar (1986) had recommended that the median be used instead of the mea”
- Improving the Writing, Knowledge, and Motivation of Struggling Young Writers: Effects of Self-Regulated Strategy Development With and Without Peer Support (2006, background): “Graham (2006) examined effect sizes for studies in which strategies for planning, revising, or both were explicitly taught to school-aged students.”
- Teaching and Learning Argumentative Reading and Writing: A Review of Research (2011, background): “the quality of supporting reasons (Ferretti et al., 2007; Graham, 2006).”
- Do Goals Affect the Structure of Students' Argumentative Writing Strategies? (2009, background): “In a recent meta-analysis of the strategy instruction literature, Graham (2006) documented the powerful effects of teaching explicit strategies on the writing of students who differ in age and ability.”
- Teaching Writing in Primary Education: Classroom Practice, Time, Teachers’ Beliefs and Skills (2018, background): “As proposed by Cutler and Graham (2008), we first determined what the current practice was for writing education in Dutch primary schools.”
- Research-Based Writing Practices and the Common Core (2015, background): “Many of the reviews examined a single writing treatment, such as word processing (e.g., Bangert-Drowns, 1993) or strategy instruction (e.g., Graham, 2006), whereas others were more comprehensive, examining the effectiveness of multiple writing practices (e.g., Graham, McKeown, Kiuhara, & Harris,…”