Models of the Creative Process: Past, Present and Future
By Todd Lubart. 2001
888 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Mechanical Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ac57ed1532fc5e22a40661f3ecde3f7ff99e60e9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Justin M. Berg
- Michael D. Mumford
- Sameh Said‐Metwaly
- Eva Kyndt
- W. Van den Noortgate
- Baptiste Barbot
- Sabine Sonnentag
- R. Reiter‐Palmon
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Michael D. Mumford
- R. Reiter‐Palmon
- Justin M. Berg
- Samuel T. Hunter
- Baptiste Barbot
- Eva Kyndt
- Sameh Said‐Metwaly
- W. Van den Noortgate
In Mechanical Engineering
- Michael D. Mumford
- Justin M. Berg
- Richard T. Marcy
- Sameh Said‐Metwaly
- Eva Kyndt
- W. Van den Noortgate
- Samuel T. Hunter
- R. Reiter‐Palmon
Citations in the corpus
- The Mystery in the Kitchen: Culinary Creativity (2008, background): “Although, admittedly, it is hard to know to what extent the creative process varies according to the artistic field, that is, the nature of the task (Lubart, 2001; Nemiro, 1997), creativity researchers in general have long been aware of the importance of both the nature of the final product and the ”
- The effectiveness of creativity training: A quantitative review (2004, background): “Given recent advances in computer-assisted instruction (Nieveen & Gustafson, 1999), as well as advances in our understanding of the cognitive mechanisms underlying creative thought (Brophy, 1988; Lubart, 2001), the merits of this approach to creativity training clearly warrant more attention.”
- The generality-specificity of creativity: Exploring the structure of creative potential with EPoC (2016, background): “This cluster is not restricted to Guilford’s “convergent thinking” (Guilford, 1950; Guilford, 1967), although it conceptually encompasses some convergent operations needed for the creative work such as “synthesis” and “evaluation of ideas” (see e.g., Cropley, 2006; Lubart, 2001; Osborn, 1953).”
- Malevolent Creativity in Terrorist Organizations (2013, background): “Some even go so far as to discourage the examination of the creative process altogether and call for a focus on the information-processing steps occurring within each stage of the creative process (Lubart, 2001).”
- Can Traditional Divergent Thinking Tests Be Trusted in Measuring and Predicting Real-World Creativity? (2011, background): “The creative thinking process refers to the sequence of cognitive activities that can lead to novel, yet appropriate, productions in a given problem context (Lubart, 2000–2001 ).”
- The Organizational Life of an Idea: Integrating Social Network, Creativity and Decision-Making Perspectives (2007, methodology): “According to the creativity literature, the creative process consists of activities, such as problem identification, problem construction, and response generation (Lubart, 2001).”
- Evaluative Aspects of Creative Thought: Errors in Appraising the Implications of New Ideas (2006, methodology): “Other work by Lubart (1994, 2001), in a study examining creativity in story writing and drawing, found that early evaluation—presumably evaluations occurring shortly after idea generation—contributed to the production of more creative products.”
- Creative Potential and its Measurement (2013, background): “Based on more than a century of work, the process can be conceived in terms of divergent-exploratory actions, which are extensive or expansive, and convergent-integrative actions, which are intensive and bring focus (Lubart, 2000).”
- Balancing on the Creative Highwire (2016, background): “Theories of the creative process suggest that to develop creative ideas, creators iterate between divergent and convergent thinking, as they generate possible ideas with divergent thinking and evaluate them with convergent thinking (Guilford, 1967; Amabile, 1996; Lubart, 2001).”
- Conceptual Combination: Alternative Knowledge Structures, Alternative Heuristics (2005, methodology): “As Lubart (2001) and Perkins (1992) have pointed out, however, different heuristics may be used in process execution depending on the domain in which the individual is working, the Creativity Research Journal 79 We would like to thank Shane Connelly, Jorge Mendoza, Blain Gaddis, Suzy Marta, Lyle…”
- The Incubation Effect: Hatching a Solution? (2009, background): “In practice, creativity is often conceived of as a form of problem solving, with problems being broadly defined as goals to be reached (Lubart, 2001).”
- Intrinsic Motivation and Creativity Related to Product: A Meta-analysis of the Studies Published Between 1990–2010 (2013, background): “Also, they can integrate the research that investigated other types of motivation and aspects of creativity such as creativity as a process (Lubart, 2001), related to person (Martinsen, 2011) or to place such as stress, time pressure or climate for creativity (Eisenberg & Thompson, 2011; Hsu & Fan,…”