Digital divides? Student and staff perceptions of information and communication technologies

379 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Blended learning environments: Using social networking sites to enhance the first year experience (2010, methodology): “There were no concerns from students regarding either the use of Web 2.0 technologies within the course or privacy issues, as was found in previous studies (Waycott et al, 2010, Salaway et al, 2007, Lohnes & Kinzer, 2007).”
The impact of perceived enjoyment, perceived reciprocal benefits and knowledge power on students' knowledge sharing through Facebook (2017, background): “…the possibility of using Facebook for personal and educational purposes among higher education faculties and students, and highlighted the benefits and limitations of using technologies as teaching and learning tools (Roblyer, McDaniel, Webb, Herman, & Witty, 2010; Waycott et al., 2010).”
Beyond natives and immigrants: exploring types of net generation students (2010, background): “This research suggests there is limited evidence of a clear distinction between digital natives and immigrants, although some differences have been identified (Kennedy et al. 2008; Waycott et al. 2010).”
The myths of the digital native and the multitasker (2017, background): “Twenty-first century education not only allows, but actually requires, seamless and ambient integration of technologies in physical environments in the sense of Weiser's (1991) notion of ubiquitous computing.”