Cognitive Bases of Second Language Fluency

By D. Coulson. 2011

422 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ab030bd19b0551535a90f7470621a9cd8b61f47e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Education

In Language and Linguistics

Citations in the corpus

Second Language Comprehensibility Revisited: Investigating the Effects of Learner Background (2015, background): “Speech rate was common to both, suggesting that both pronunciation and lexicogrammar are linked to fluency (Segalowitz, 2010).”
Individual differences in L2 acquisition of English phonology: The relation between cognitive abilities and phonological processing☆ (2015, background): “We hypothesize that a crucial aspect of more native-like L2 phonological processing lies in reduced interference from the L1, and automatization of processing for L2-specific phonological dimensions (Segalowitz, 2010).”
What Do We (Think We) Know About Formulaic Language? An Evaluation of the Current State of Play (2012, background): “Recent explications of how fluent and/or automatic language is processed (Graybiel, 2008; Paradis, 2009; Segalowitz, 2010) (continue to) distinguish between implicit and explicit learning, and procedural and declarative knowledge.”
Formulaic language (2008, neutral): “2010 Segalowitz, N. (2010). Cognitive bases of second language fluency.”
Moving toward a neuroplasticity view of bilingualism, executive control, and aging (2014, background): “When L2 proficiency is low, L2 language production is more controlled and less automatic (see also Favreau & Segalowitz, 1983; Segalowitz, 2010; Segalowitz & Hulstijn, 2005), thus requiring inhibitory control (prefrontal function, in particular; see also Petrides, 1998).”
Does a Speaking Task Affect Second Language Comprehensibility (2015, background): “, Trofimovich & Isaacs, 2012)—despite evidence that linguistic resources needed for speakers to successfully complete a task depend on several variables, including task formality and complexity (Kormos, 2006; Robinson, 2005; Segalowitz, 2010; Skehan, 2009).”
Size and Depth of Vocabulary Knowledge: What the Research Shows (2014, background): “Recently, there has been some interest in training fluency in L2 language pedagogy, largely driven by work of Norman Segalowitz and colleagues and synthesized in Segalowitz (2010) (see Segalowitz et al., 1995; Segalowitz et al., 1998).”
THE EFFECTS OF INPUT ENHANCEMENT ON GRAMMAR LEARNING AND COMPREHENSION (2013, background): “However, this last hypothesis—that there would be a trade-off effect—runs counter to many current learning theories that suggest that increased cognitive effort is effective for both comprehension and restructuring (DeKeyser & Juffs, 2005 ; Ellis, 2006 ; Segalowitz, 2010 ).”
PEER INTERACTION AND CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK FOR ACCURACY AND FLUENCY DEVELOPMENT (2012, background): “First, SR has been found to be strongly related to perceived fl uency (e.g., Cucchiarini et al., 2002 ), and, second, it can be a measurable performance phenomenon considered to manifest underlying cognitive processing (Segalowitz, 2010 ).”
Task-Based Learner Production: A Substantive and Methodological Review (2016, background): “And fluency is characterized by the rate and/or amount of production in a given time (Segalowitz, 2010).”
Essentials of a Theory of Language Cognition (2019, background): “Frequency of experience is central in usage-based approaches to language acquisition (N. Ellis, 2011; N. Ellis & Wulff, 2015b) as it is in skilltheoretic approaches (DeKeyser, 2007; Segalowitz, 2010).”
Linguistic skills and speaking fluency in a second language (2012, background): “Segalowitz (2010) urges researchers to distinguish between utterance fluency, cognitive fluency, and perceived fluency.”
The construct of language proficiency in the study of bilingualism from a cognitive perspective* (2012, background): “(For a treatise of ﬂuency issues in bilingualism, see Segalowitz, 2010.)”
Fluency in Second Language Testing: Insights From Different Disciplines (2018, background): “Segalowitz (2010) has pointed out the distinctions between utterance fluency, perceived fluency, and cognitive fluency.”
Second language fluency: speaking style or proficiency? Correcting measures of second language fluency for first language behavior (2015, methodology): “Segalowitz (2010) proposes that to measure aspects of L2-speciﬁc ﬂuency, one should gather both L1 data and L2 data to take speakers’ L1 ﬂuency into account.”
Native speakers’ perceptions of fluency and accent in L2 speech (2014, methodology): “Segalowitz (2010) proposed calculating the residuals obtained when correlating L1 and L2 fluency measures with each other.”