Increasing Preservice Teachers’ Self-Efficacy Beliefs for Technology Integration
By Ling Wang, Peggy A. Ertmer, Timothy J. Newby. 2004
485 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education, Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/aa67021b34b520347809ca38043da5b01e8167dd
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- Jo Tondeur
- Johan van Braak
- Martin Valcke
- Jason T. Abbitt
- Marina Umaschi Bers
- Guoyuan Sang
- Amanda Sullivan
- Safoura Seddighin
In Gender Studies
- Jo Tondeur
- Johan van Braak
- Martin Valcke
- Jason T. Abbitt
- Marina Umaschi Bers
- Guoyuan Sang
- Amanda Sullivan
- Safoura Seddighin
In Sociology and Political Science
- Jason T. Abbitt
- Johan van Braak
- Marina Umaschi Bers
- Guoyuan Sang
- Martin Valcke
- Jo Tondeur
- Amanda Sullivan
- Safoura Seddighin
Citations in the corpus
- An Investigation of the Relationship between Self-Efficacy Beliefs about Technology Integration and Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) among Preservice Teachers (2011, methodology): “Higher scores on the CTIS scale indicated higher perceived self-efficacy toward the integration of technology into teaching practices.”
- Student teachers' thinking processes and ICT integration: Predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology (2010, background): “When considering the interrelationship between teacher beliefs and ICT integration, there is evidence that, teachers’ constructivist beliefs about teaching and learning are a significant factor in determining patterns of classroom computer use by in-service teachers (Higgins & Moseley, 2001) and pre”
- Ready for Robotics: Bringing Together the T and E of STEM in Early Childhood Teacher Education. (2013, methodology): “…measure teacher’s knowledge in the different areas of TPcK (Technology, Pedagogies, and content Knowledge), the devTech research group designed a survey derived from the technical knowledge surveys and instruments currently used in the field (i.e. schmidt et al., 2009; sullivan & Moriarty, 2009).”