Do servant-leaders help satisfy follower needs? An organizational justice perspective
By David M. Mayer, Mary Bardes, Ronald F. Piccolo. 2008
334 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Demography, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/aa6409064bdb39f14e3ba548fb36cc21d21d6cad
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Demography
- Dirk van Dierendonck
- J. W. Peachey
- Sen Sendjaya
- D. Parris
- B. Cooper
- R. Liden
- Alexander Newman
- Fred Walumbwa
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Fred Walumbwa
- Alexander Newman
- Dirk van Dierendonck
- R. Liden
- Sen Sendjaya
- J. W. Peachey
- S. Aryee
- B. Cooper
In Sociology and Political Science
- Russell S. Cropanzano
- Ståle Pallesen
- Fred Walumbwa
- J. W. Peachey
- D. Parris
- Cecilie Schou Andreassen
- Sen Sendjaya
- Dirk van Dierendonck
Citations in the corpus
- How Servant Leadership Influences Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Roles of LMX, Empowerment, and Proactive Personality (2017, methodology): “Empirical evidence suggests that servant leaders foster more satisfied, committed, engaged and better-performing followers (Carter and Baghurst 2013; Liden et al. 2008; Mayer et al. 2008; Neubert et al. 2008).”
- A Systematic Literature Review of Servant Leadership Theory in Organizational Contexts (2012, methodology): “Greater commitment to the organization increases employee job satisfaction (Cerit 2009; Jenkins and Stewart 2010; Mayer et al. 2008; Chung et al. 2010) and consequently decreases employee turnover (Jaramillo et al. 2009b; Babakus et al. 2011).”
- Reviewing Leadership Styles: Overlaps and the Need for a New ‘Full‐Range’ Theory (2017, neutral): “It creates a perception of organizational justice and enhances followers’ need satisfaction, which improves their job satisfaction and work engagement (Mayer et al. 2008; van Dierendonck et al. 2014).”
- Impact of Servant Leadership on Performance: The Mediating Role of Affective and Cognitive Trust (2020, methodology): “This scale was selected because, first, it has been widely used and validated in different organizational settings (e.g., Hunter et al., 2013; Mayer et al., 2008; Miao et al., 2014; Neubert et al., 2008; Walumbwa et al., 2010) and, second, the original study had empirically validated the scale on…”
- HR practices and HRM outcomes: the role of basic need satisfaction (2012, background): “Accordingly, basic need satisfaction has been found to predict job satisfaction (Mayer et al., 2008), vigor (Van den Broeck et al., 2008) and affective organizational commitment (Greguras and Diefendorff, 2009).”
- Accounting for the influence of overall justice on job performance: : integrating self-determination and social exchange theories (2014, methodology): “In support of our arguments, overall justice has been reported to relate to need satisfaction (Mayer et al., 2008) and as a form of unfair treatment at work, abusive supervision has been reported to negatively relate to need satisfaction (Lian et al.”
- Servant Leadership: A systematic review and call for future research (2019, positive): “, 2014), job satisfaction (Mayer et al., 2008), thriving at work (Walumbwa, Muchiri, Misati, Wu, & Meiliani, 2018), perceptions of meaningful work (Khan, Khan, & Chaudhry, 2015), and psychological well-being (Gotsis & Grimani, 2016).”