Bullying and the peer group: A review

By Christina Salmivalli. 2010

1,726 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Plant Science, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a9a56068870076b04a41bb5e8675f98a142fa80d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Plant Science

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

School bullying from a sociocultural perspective (2018, background): “The participant role that group members adopt therefore is part of the interaction between their individual characteristics (such as emotions, attitudes and motivations) and environmental factors (Salmivalli, 2009), resonating strongly with the Ecological System approach (Bronfenbrenner, 1979).”
A review of cyberbullying and suggestions for online psychological therapy (2015, background): “…on previous research that considers bystanders to be an important element in exasperating bullying behaviour and influencing the impact on victims (Salmivalli, 2010) As such, one main objective of the intervention is to target bystanders and to increase their responsibility for intervening and…”
Anticipated feelings of guilt and shame as predictors of early adolescents' antisocial and prosocial interpersonal behaviour (2012, background): “Bullying differs from other types of aggressive behaviour in that it is carried out repeatedly against a relatively powerless target (Salmivalli, 2010).”
Cybercrime detection in online communications: The experimental case of cyberbullying detection in the Twitter network (2016, background): “Cyberbullying can be defined as the use of information and communication technology by an individual or a group of users to harass other users (Salmivalli, 2010).”
School Bullying as a Collective Action: Stigma Processes and Identity Struggling (2015, neutral): “Bullying can be defined as a social process in which a child in a less powerful position is repeatedly harassed or excluded by others (Salmivalli, 2010).”
Does peer victimization predict low self-esteem, or does low self-esteem predict peer victimization? Meta-analyses on longitudinal studies (2018, background): “…and though support for this has been found (O’Moore & Minton, 2005), we would warn against providing single vulnerable children with assertiveness training because interventions focused on an individual as opposed to a whole classroom are unlikely to work (Fox & Boulton, 2003; Salmivalli, 2010).”
Bullying in schools: the power of bullies and the plight of victims. (2014, background): “Although peers typically do not personally like those who bully others, they are still likely to side with the bully in part to protect their social status, reputation, and physical safety ( Juvonen & Galván 2008, Salmivalli 2010).”
The effectiveness of school-based bullying prevention programs: A systematic review (2014, positive): “Moreover, children can be passively involved as bystanders, offering varying degrees of support to bullies or victims (Salmivalli, 2010).”
Bullying Participant Behaviors Questionnaire (BPBQ): Establishing a Reliable and Valid Measure (2016, background): “The five latent variables (bully, assistant, victim, defender, and outsider) were correlated because the literature suggests that there is overlap among the bullying participant behaviors (Salmivalli, 2010).”
Mechanisms of Moral Disengagement and Their Associations With Indirect Bullying, Direct Bullying, and Pro-Aggressive Bystander Behavior (2020, background): “…not might also be linked to factors such as peer status as bullying has been associated with social status (de Bruyn, Cillessen, & Wissink, 2010; Thunfors & Cornell, 2008), and the status of the defender was important for intervention in bullying situations (Pöyhönen, Juvonen, & Salmivalli, 2010).”
Beware the angry leader: Trait anger and trait anxiety as predictors of petty tyranny ☆ (2013, background): “We suggest the reach of petty tyranny to be particularly similar to that of bullying, with many parties involved—even so in the popular scenario of a single perpetrator and a single victim (Namie & Lutgen-Sandvik, 2010; Salmivalli, 2010).”
Which personality traits are related to traditional bullying and cyberbullying? A study with the Big Five, Dark Triad and sadism (2017, background): “In the current study, we found that Machiavellianism was a predictor of traditional bullying, which adds credibility to the explanation that bullying is indeed a calculated strategy to achieve dominance (see also Salmivalli, 2010; Sutton & Keogh, 2000; Volk et al., 2012).”
The Role of Classroom Peer Ecology and Bystanders’ Responses in Bullying (2015, background): “who are seen as unlikely to stand up for themselves or be defended by others (8, 10).”
Effectiveness of the KiVa Antibullying Program: Grades 1-3 and 7-9 (2013, background): “Bullying can, in addition, be considered a group phenomenon, in which bystanders’ behaviors have an effect on the maintenance of bullying and on the adjustment of the victims (Salmivalli, 2010; Salmivalli et al., 1996).”