Effectiveness of the KiVa Antibullying Program: Grades 1-3 and 7-9

239 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Personality Trait of Environmental Sensitivity Predicts Children’s Positive Response to School-Based Antibullying Intervention (2018, background): “And at least one study provided evidence that treatment effects are stronger in boys than in girls (Kärnä et al., 2013).”
What is bullying? A theoretical redefinition. (2014, background): “…interventions that target peer responses to bullying as a means of reducing positive interpretations of the bullies’ signal of dominance (e.g., Kärnä et al., 2013) as well as why powerful bullies, whose signals are likely to be stronger, are less affected by such interventions (Garandeau et…”
The Longitudinal Interplay between Bullying, Victimization, and Social Status: Age-related and Gender Differences (2015, methodology): “We used data collected for the KiVa antibullying program evaluation in two different cohorts covering either grades 3–6 or grades 7–9 (see Kärnä et al., 2011, 2013, for details on recruitment and the intervention program).”
The effectiveness of school-based bullying prevention programs: A systematic review (2014, unknown): “KiVa (Karna et al., 2013) a.”