Conceptualizing and measuring cultures and their consequences: a comparative review of GLOBE's and Hofstede's approaches

By Mansour Javidan, R. House, P. Dorfman, P. Hanges, Mary Sully de Luque. 2006

893 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Anthropology, Communication, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a1d713d065122bf6658121b4f0dc9eca01bb2732

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Anthropology

1. P. Koveos
2. A. van Hoorn
3. Peter B. Smith
4. Christian Hopp
5. Linghui Tang
6. Ute Stephan
7. K. Meyer
8. Patrick De Pelsmacker

In Communication

1. V. Taras
2. Oded Shenkar
3. Piers Steel
4. Saul Estrin
5. P. Koveos
6. Chris Stride
7. A. van Hoorn
8. Andreas Engelen

In Social Psychology

1. V. Taras
2. Piers Steel
3. Bradley L Kirkman
4. Ute Stephan
5. L. Uhlaner
6. Martin Eisend
7. Oded Shenkar
8. P. Koveos

Citations in the corpus

• Performance-based vs socially supportive culture: A cross-national study of descriptive norms and entrepreneurship (2010, background): “Given that descriptive norms reflect the behavioral patterns in a society, and thus serve as informal institutions, we have argued that cultural descriptive norms can be used to predict behavioral outcomes at the societal level (also House et al., 2004; Javidan et al., 2006).”
• Communication Styles as Dimensions of National Culture (2011, background): “Following subsequent debates (Hofstede, 2006; Javidan et al., 2006; Smith, 2006), this author concludes that the practices measures have stronger face validity.”
• Comparative and International Corporate Governance (2010, neutral): “Hofstede, 2001 ; House, Javidan, & Dorfman, 2001 ; Javidan, House, Dorfman, Hanges, & de Luque, 2006 ).”
• Mapping world cultures: Cluster formation, sources and implications (2013, background): “The very existence of the state encourages homogenization of cultural elements (Cavusgil et al., 2004; Gould & Grein, 2009; Hofstede, 1980, 2001; House et al., 2004; Javidan et al., 2006; Ronen & Shenkar, 1985; Smith et al., 2008; Tang & Koveos, 2008; Tweed, Conway, & Ryder, 1999).”
• A theoretical grounding and test of the GEM model (2008, background): “, 2003; Uhlaner and Thurik, 2007), but the results of attempts to date to measure the effect of national culture on entrepreneurial activity using standard national culture measures and appropriate controls have been mixed (Spencer and Gomez, 2004; Levie and Hunt, 2005), reflecting recent findings o”
• Which Is Easier, Adjusting to a Similar or to a Dissimilar Culture? (2007, result): “It has been claimed (Hofstede, 2006), but disputed (Javidan et al., 2006), that a reanalysis of the GLOBE data (House et al., 2004) produces a result that resembles the original Hofstede cultural indices.”