Performance-based vs socially supportive culture: A cross-national study of descriptive norms and entrepreneurship

By Ute Stephan, L. Uhlaner. 2010

595 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f23a8e16bd3a2fdd591970759d8420f1d5002268

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Citations in the corpus

Intergenerational transmission of entrepreneurial intentions (2012, result): “Our finding that this transmission is to some extent culture-dependent adds to the literature on cross-cultural entrepreneurship research (Hayton et al., 2002; Mueller and Thomas, 2001; Stephan and Uhlaner, 2010).”
Institutions and social entrepreneurship: The role of institutional voids, institutional support, and institutional configurations (2014, methodology): “Normative Institutional Context: SSC (Hypotheses 4 and 5) SSC refers to informal cultural norms that encourage cooperation based on repeated experiences of friendliness, supportiveness, cooperation, and helpfulness (Stephan & Uhlaner, 2010: 1351).”
Measuring employee innovation:a review of existing scales and the development of the innovative behavior and innovation support inventories across cultures (2017, background): “Yet related research at the country-level confirms a relationship of culture with innovation and entrepreneurship (Shane, 1992; Stephan and Uhlaner, 2010).”
Entrepreneurs’ human capital and growth aspirations: the moderating role of regional entrepreneurial culture (2019, background): “it should be noted that encouraging certain norms and values may not be so simple, given the stability of culture (Stephan and Uhlaner 2010).”
Informal institutions and international entrepreneurship (2017, background): “Policymakers have largely concentrated on formal institutions to increase entrepreneurial opportunities, but formal institutions may not be sufficient to stimulate international entrepreneurship (Stephan & Uhlaner, 2010).”
Institutional support and women’s entrepreneurial self-efficacy (2017, result): “Consistent with previous studies (Hopp and Stephan, 2012; Kibler et al., 2014; M~unoz and Kibler, 2016; Stephan and Uhlaner, 2010), this article demonstrates that informal institutional support positively predicts women’s self-confidence in entrepreneurial initiatives.”
Entrepreneurship and culture (2010, background): “Applicable to both economic and cultural factors is the notion of supply, or push, and demand, or pull, factors for business start-up and entrepreneurship in general (Thurik, Carree, Van Stel and Audretsch 2008; Stephan and Uhlaner 2010).”
Entrepreneurial orientation and SME performance across societal cultures: An international study (2016, methodology): “Employing a second-order conceptualization of societal culture seems advisable because such an approach represents culture more completely than an approach focusing on particular primary dimensions (Stephan & Uhlaner, 2010).”
Stress Processes: An Essential Ingredient in the Entrepreneurial Process (2018, background): “However, many entrepreneurs are able to successfully reduce the stress associated with entrepreneurial activity (Baron, Franklin, & Hmieleski, 2016; Stephan & Uhlander, 2010).”
How culture moulds the effects of self-efficacy and fear of failure on entrepreneurship (2013, background): “These values are often associated with entrepreneurship (Davidsson 1995; Stephan and Uhlaner 2010).”
Beyond Red Tape and Fools: Institutional Theory in Entrepreneurship Research, 1992–2014 (2017, methodology): “However, at the same time, there are major knowledge gaps that provide abundant opportunities to further improve EIn research. Our review confirms the findings of Bruton et al. (2010) that institutional theory falls into two distinct categories, an institutional setting stream and a legitimacy strea”