Are Fluency Measures Accurate Predictors of Reading Achievement?

By S. Schilling, J. Carlisle, Sarah E. Scott, Ji Zeng. The Elementary school journal, 2007

143 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9f24d1cbd8788861b3dc72af568b524cbee5cc32

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. D. Berebitsky
2. J. Carlisle
3. Michael J. Kieffer
4. Nonie K. Lesaux
5. John R. Kirby
6. S. H. Deacon
7. Xi Chen
8. Peter N. Bowers

In Statistics and Probability

1. D. Berebitsky
2. J. Carlisle
3. Michael J. Kieffer
4. Nonie K. Lesaux
5. John R. Kirby
6. S. H. Deacon
7. Xi Chen
8. Peter N. Bowers

Citations in the corpus

• Literacy coaching as a component of professional development (2011, methodology): “First graders’ performance on NWF was significantly correlated with spring performance on Iowa Test of Basic Skills (ITBS), Word Analysis subtest: fall .54, winter .57, and spring .59; in addition, first graders’ performance on NWF was significantly related to performance on ITBS Reading Total measu”