The second version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire

By J. Pejtersen, T. Kristensen, V. Borg, Jakob Bjorner. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 2010

1,165 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Authenticity at Work: Development and Validation of an Individual Authenticity Measure at Work (2013, methodology): “Work demands were measured with the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ) (Kristensen and Borg 2003; Pejtersen et al. 2010).”
Emotional demands, emotional labour and occupational outcomes in school principals (2017, methodology): “Four of the scales (emotional demands, quantitative demands, burnout and job satisfaction) were drawn from the revised Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ-II: Pejtersen et al., 2010b).”
Retaining Social Workers: The Role of Quality of Work and Psychosocial Safety Climate for Work Engagement, Job Satisfaction, and Organizational Commitment (2019, methodology): “Role conflict (RC) was measured by three items from the COPSOQ II (Berthelsen et al., 2014; Pejtersen et al., 2010).”
Does shared and differentiated transformational leadership predict followers' working conditions and well-being?☆ (2012, methodology): “Job satisfactionwasmeasured using a five-item scale from the COPSOQ (Kristensen et al., 2005; Pejtersen et al., 2010).”
Effects of support on stress and burnout in school principals (2016, methodology): “All scales were taken from the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ-II; Pejtersen et al. 2010).”