Conceptual and Methodological Issues in the Analysis of Data from Dyads and Groups

By Deborah A. Kashy, M. B. Donnellan. 2012

818 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9aa166033e0c2f55634a50b5a8007a39e17aa2fb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Problematic alcohol use and marital distress: An interdependence theory perspective (2014, background): “APIM uses the dyad as the unit of analysis and suggests that a person’s outcome is affected both by his or her own predictor (i.e. the actor effect, indicated by horizontal lines in Figures 1–4), and also by his or her partner’s predictor (i.e. the partner effect, indicated by cross-paths in Figures”
Modelling job crafting behaviours: Implications for work engagement (2016, methodology): “We will use the Actor–Partner Interdependence Model (APIM; Kashy and Kenny, 2000; see Method for details) to investigate whether the actor’s job crafting is related to the partner’s work engagement, through partner’s job crafting.”
Day-to-Day Changes in Intimacy Predict Heightened Relationship Passion, Sexual Occurrence, and Sexual Satisfaction (2012, methodology): “The current data were analyzed within the framework of the actor–partner interdependence model (APIM; Kenny & Kashy, 2000; Kenny et al., 2006), which models the interdependence inherent in close relationships and also provides estimates for both actor and partner effects.”
Normal and abnormal personality traits are associated with marital satisfaction for both men and women: An Actor–Partner Interdependence Model analysis (2010, methodology): “Multilevel modeling (MLM) using the Actor–Partner Interdependence Model for distinguishable dyads (APIM; Kashy & Kenny, 2000) was used to test associations between personality and marital dissatisfaction while accounting for the nested (individuals within couples) structure of the data.”
Direct and indirect effects of attachment orientation on relationship quality and loneliness in married couples (2013, methodology): “The actor–partner interdependence model (APIM) provides a framework within which to examine outcome interdependence as a function of both an individual’s own behavior (i.e., actor effect) and the partner’s behavior (i.e., partner effect; Kenny, Kashy, & Cook, 2006).”
Plausibility reappraisals and shifts in middle school students' climate change conceptions (2013, methodology): “A common way to determine ICC is to calculate the proportion of variance explained by group membership, use the calculated ICC value to calculate the test statistic (z), and then determine the p-value from the test statistic (Kashy & Kenny, 2000).”
Attachment and daily sexual goals: A study of dating couples (2008, methodology): “We used the Actor–Partner Interdependence Model (APIM; Kashy & Kenny, 2000) to assess the contribution of both partners’ attachment orientations to daily sex goals.”
Love at first sight or friends first? Ties among partner personality trait similarity, relationship onset, relationship quality, and love (2007, methodology): “Data obtained from couples are not independent (Kashy & Kenny, 2000).”
Power struggles (2018, methodology): “We model the data together in a dyadic data analysis using the actor–partner interdependence model (Kashy & Kenny, 1999; Kenny, 1996; see Iida, Seidman, & Shrout, current issue; Rogers, Wood, & Furr, current issue; and Stern & West, current issue, for further details and potential alternatives).”
I feel, therefore you act: Intrapersonal and interpersonal effects of emotion on negotiation as a function of social power (2010, background): “…challenges, a number of methodologists who work with social interaction datahave advocated the use ofmultilevel models to account for individual process while controlling for non-independence in both predictor and outcome measures (Gonzalez & Griffin, 1999; Kashy & Kenny, 2000; Kenny et al., 2006).”
Believing shapes seeing: The impact of diversity beliefs on the construal of group composition (2010, methodology): “Because our level of analysis is the group, and individual-level perceptions were likely not independent (Kashy & Kenny, 2000), we aggregated the individual-level answers to the group level by taking the mean.”
Attachment styles as predictors of Facebook‐related jealousy and surveillance in romantic relationships (2013, methodology): “Analyses were based on the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model (APIM; Kashy & Kenny, 2000) because dyads were the unit of analysis rather than individuals.”
The Objective Value of Subjective Value: A Multi-round Negotiation Study (2010, positive): “…subjective value obtained by the two members of a negotiation dyad are both conceptually and empirically interdependent (Kenny, 1995), we tested our individual-level hypotheses while controlling for dyadic interdependence using the actor–partner interdependence model (APIM; Kashy & Kenny, 2000).”