J. DeSimone
Sociology and Political Science · 2015–2017
A researcher in the Science corpus: 3 papers; trusts 25 researchers and is trusted by 13 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Subfields
- Sociology and Political Science — 19 citations into it; #5,022 of 22,756 by trust here, #7,374 by citations
- Clinical Psychology — 17 citations into it
- Applied Psychology — 12 citations into it; #3,203 of 3,868 by trust here, #3,135 by citations
- Social Psychology — 8 citations into it
- Safety Research — 5 citations into it
Whom J. DeSimone trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
- John A. Johnson
- P. Curran
- Marcus Crede
- L. Angeles
- Adam W. Meade
- Christopher Peterson
- Michael R. Maniaci
- R. Millsap
- Jason L. Huang
- S. Bartholomew
Who trusts J. DeSimone overall
- Dominik J. Leiner
- Minseop Kim
- P. D. Harms
- Philippe Goldammer
- Melissa G. Keith
- Oliver Curry
- N. Bowling
- T. Beehr
- Anthony Gibson
- H. Annen
Papers from J. DeSimone's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers J. DeSimone trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- Ascertaining the validity of individual protocols from Web-based personality inventories.
- Careless Responding to Reverse-Worded Items: Implications for Confirmatory Factor Analysis
- The revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R)
- Identifying careless responses in survey data. (Psychological methods)
- The viability of crowdsourcing for survey research (Behavior Research Methods)
- What Is Coefficient Alpha? An Examination of Theory and Applications
- The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures ☆
- Detecting and Deterring Insufficient Effort Responding to Surveys
- Character Strengths and Virtues: A Handbook and Classification
- 25 years of higher‐order confirmatory factor analysis in the organizational sciences: A critical review and development of reporting recommendations
Their papers
- Best practice recommendations for data screening (2015) — 636 citations
- Response Speed and Response Consistency as Mutually Validating Indicators of Data Quality in Online Samples (2017) — 211 citations
- Dirty Data: The Effects of Screening Respondents Who Provide Low-Quality Data in Survey Research (2017) — 212 citations