Sex Differences in Coping Behavior: A Meta-Analytic Review and an Examination of Relative Coping
By L. Tamres, Denise L. Janicki, V. Helgeson. 2002
1,740 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Health Professions, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/96d7b572a1a6266244b66f8c05106d74da6fd529
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Health Professions
- A. Shirom
- Wilmar B. Schaufeli
- Bettina Kubicek
- Christian Korunka
- Peter L. T. Hoonakker
- Robert J. Vallerand
- Yitzhak Fried
- Kerry A. Reynolds
In Social Psychology
- M. Del Giudice
- Arielle Bonneville-Roussy
- Sung-il Kim
- T. Bouffard
- Juyeon Song
- D. Schmitt
- A. Shirom
- Robert J. Vallerand
Citations in the corpus
- Are men universally more dismissing than women? Gender differences in romantic attachment across 62 cultural regions (2003, methodology): “obtained from United Nations Development Programme (2001). Scores from Serbia and Taiwan were not available.”
- A meta-analytic review of benefit finding and growth. (2006, background): “…coping strategies tend to be positively related to one another, partly as a reaction to distress (i.e., more distress leads to greater coping; see Tamres et al., 2002, for a further discussion of this issue), the relations of benefit finding to each of these three coping strategies may not be…”
- Is Emotional Suppression Always Bad? A Matter of Flexibility and Gender Differences (2019, background): “It has been argued that women are particularly prone to use reappraisal because they would appraise events as more stressful (Tamres et al. 2002) and report greater affect intensity comparing to men (Fujita et al.”
- Revisiting gender differences: What we know and what lies ahead☆ (2015, background): “Because women perceive stressors as more severe than men, they may expend more effort in response to potential threats by using these active coping strategies (Tamres et al., 2002).”
- The Adaptive Calibration Model of stress responsivity (2010, positive): “Nevertheless, the model is consistent with women’s higher sensitivity to social rejection (see above) and stronger propensity to seek for social support in stressful situations (Belle, 1987; Tamres et al., 2002).”
- Introduction to Interpersonal Acceptance-Rejection Theory (IPARTheory) and Evidence (2016, background): “As is true for most other bodies of research on the coping process (Ki, et al., 2018; Somerfield & McCrae, 2000; Tamres et al., 2002), little is yet known with confidence about the mechanisms and processes that help answer coping subtheory's basic question.”
- Financial Stress, Social Supports, Gender, and Anxiety During College: A Stress-Buffering Perspective ψ (2018, background): “Although a number of studies have documented greater availability and use of social support among women relative to men (e.g., Denton et al., 2004; Tamres et al., 2002), some scholars question the assumption that women would benefit from social supports, as women’s social network involvement can be…”