V. Helgeson
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · 2002–2006
A researcher in the Science corpus: 4 papers; trusts 4 researchers and is trusted by 26 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Whom V. Helgeson trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
- R. Rosenthal
- L. Hedges
- Mark Lipsey
- P. Tomich
- Xiao-Hua Zhou
- Terri D. Pigott
- P. Lachenbruch
- Nancy A. Obuchowski
- P. Alex Linley
Who trusts V. Helgeson overall
- Crystal L. Park
- Eranda Jayawickreme
- L. Calhoun
- C. Dolbier
- Catarina Ramos
- Login S. George
- Machteld van den Heuvel
- Patti M. Valkenburg
- L. Blackie
- R. Tedeschi
Papers from V. Helgeson's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers V. Helgeson trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.)
- The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results
- Statistical Methods for Meta‐Analysis
- The power of statistical tests in meta-analysis. (Psychological methods)
- Positive Change Following Trauma and Adversity: A Review (Journal of Traumatic Stress)
- SF-36 health survey: Manual and interpretation guide
- Practical Meta-Analysis
- Is finding something good in the bad always good? Benefit finding among women with breast cancer. (Health Psychology)
- Biobehavioral responses to stress in females: tend-and-befriend, not fight-or-flight. (Psychology Review)
- Sex Differences in Coping Behavior: A Meta-Analytic Review and an Examination of Relative Coping
Their papers
- A meta-analytic review of benefit finding and growth. (2006) — 1,749 citations
- Internet Paradox Revisited (2002) — 2,331 citations
- Sex Differences in Coping Behavior: A Meta-Analytic Review and an Examination of Relative Coping (2002) — 1,740 citations
- Is finding something good in the bad always good? Benefit finding among women with breast cancer. (2004) — 645 citations