Abusive supervision and workplace deviance: the mediating role of interactional justice and the moderating role of power distance

176 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Does it take two to Tangle? Subordinates’ Perceptions of and Reactions to Abusive Supervision (2015, background): “, supervisor; Mitchell and Ambrose 2007) and other scapegoats (e.g., coworkers; Liu et al. 2010; Restubog et al. 2011; Tepper et al. 2009; Thau and Mitchell 2010; Wang et al. 2012).”
Abusive Supervision and Employee Deviance: A Multifoci Justice Perspective (2017, unknown): “2010), should play a role in qualifying the effects of abusive supervision on subordinate attitudes and behaviors due to the inherent power differential between supervisors and employees (Hu et al. 2011; Kernan et al. 2011; Lian et al. 2012b; Liu et al. 2010; Tepper 2007; Wang et al. 2012).”
A Cross-Cultural Examination of Subordinates' Perceptions of and Reactions to Abusive Supervision (2015, background): “Much of the work conducted on the influence of culture focuses on value orientations and testing the effects of value orientations with samples only from subordinates from one country (e.g., Lian et al., 2012; Lin et al., 2013; Liu et al., 2010; Wang et al., 2012).”