Studying in higher education: students' approaches to learning, self‐regulation, and cognitive strategies

By Annamari Heikkilä, Kirsti Lonka. 2006

430 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/956d5e8c755310d3c88171f5a40bac9626010d73

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Education

Citations in the corpus

Enhancing self-regulation and approaches to learning in first-year college students: a narrative-based programme assessed in the Iberian Peninsula (2010, background): “Heikkila and Lonka (2006) also found that students from the latter group achieved better grades, and the mean differences were statistically significant.”
The direct and indirect effect of motivation for learning on students' approaches to learning through the perceptions of workload and task complexity (2011, background): “To a certain extent motivation is understood as a variable concept in terms of context and subject areas (Heikkila & Lonka, 2006 ).”
Students’ assessment preferences and approaches to learning: can formative assessment make a difference? (2006, result): “The well-known study by Marton and Saljo (1976) gave qualitative evidence for this, but later studies (Trigwell & Prosser, 1991; Watkins, 2001; Struyven et al., 2003; Heikkila & Lonka, 2006 ) also provided more quantitative evidence.”
Transformational Instructor-Leadership in Higher Education Teaching: A Meta-Analytic Review and Research Agenda (2016, background): “However, findings in educational research showed that there is a strong association between students self-concepts and learning outcomes in a HEI course (e.g., Heikkilä & Lonka, 2006).”
Disciplinary and gender differences among higher education students in self‐regulated learning strategies (2010, background): “Furthermore, evidence suggests highly self-regulative learners are academically more successful than those students with low self-regulation skills or those who lack regulation in their learning (Heikkilä & Lonka, 2006; Lynch, 2006; Tynjälä, Salminen, Sutela, Nuutinen, & Pitkänen, 2005).”