Bullying in Danish work-life: Prevalence and health correlates

By E. G. Mikkelsen, Staale Einarsen. 2001

585 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/953b863e19e715a2fb32d86e6775c2f233d6e931

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

In Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Bullying in the workplace: definition, prevalence, antecedents and consequences (2010, methodology): “Most studies conducted since the onset of workplace bullying research, have applied a prospective survey approach (e.g. Einarsen & Raknes, 1997; Mikkelsen & Einarsen, 2001; Vartia, 1996; Zapf, Knorz, & Kulla, 1996).”
Health consequences of workplace bullying: experiences from the perspective of employees in the public service sector (2006, methodology): “Several studies have shown connections between workplace bullying and ill health in the form of psychosomatic symptoms and severe psychological stress symptoms (e.g. Niedl, 1996; Einarson, Raknes, Matthiesen & Hellesøy, 1996; Einarsen & Raknes 1997; Gemzøe Mikkelsen & Einarsen, 2001).”
The nature, causes and consequences of bullying at work: The Norwegian experience (2005, result): “Similar results were found in a group of 124 former Danish victims of workplace bullying (Mikkelsen & Einarsen, 2001).”
The world turns at 33 and 45: Defining simple cutoff scores for the Negative Acts Questionnaire–Revised in a representative sample (2013, methodology): “Mikkelsen and Einarsen (2001) argue that reporting two negative behaviours over a period of at least 6 months is required to identify victims of workplace bullying.”
The Effects of Ethical Climates on Bullying Behaviour in the Workplace (2009, methodology): “…accordance with this definition researchers of bullying consistently agree that the act is systematic and repetitive (Leymann and Gustaffson, 1996; Mikkelsen and Einarsen, 2001; Rayner and Hoel, 1997; Zapf and Einarsen 2001), and it is intended to be hostile and/or perceived to be hostile by the…”
Bullying is detrimental to health, but all bullying behaviours are not necessarily equally damaging (2004, result): “Similar results were found by Mackensen von Astfeld (2000), Mikkelsen and Einarsen (2001) and Zapf et al .”
Burned by Bullying in the American Workplace: Prevalence, Perception, Degree and Impact† (2007, unknown): “Researchers usually apply a six-month duration criterion to differentiate bullying from lower-level negativity (Hoel et al., 2001; Leymann, 1990; Mikkelsen and Einarsen, 2001; Zapf et al., 1996).”