Bullying in the digital age: a critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth.

2,822 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

School Bullying and Cyberbullying Among Boys and Girls: Roles and Overlap (2017, background): “Smith and Slonje (2010) and Menesini and Nocentini (2009), on the other hand, argued that the repetition criteria does not apply for cyberbullying.”
Detection of Cyberbullying Incidents on the Instagram Social Network (2015, background): “…(Doo-ley, Py ˙ zalski, and Cross 2009; Monks and Smith 2006; Olweus 2013; Py˙zalski 2010), such as a user being more technologically savvy than another (Kowalski et al. 2014), a group of users targeting one user, or a popular user targeting a less popular one (Limber, Kowalski, and Agatston 2008).”
Parenting in a digital age: A review of parents' role in preventing adolescent cyberbullying (2017, background): “Although Kowalski et al. (2014)'s review provides a critical summary of parents' role in cyberbullying, no review to date has considered the evidence of family's influence on cyberbullying by distinct parenting qualities (e.g., warmth, control), as well as how the influence of these factors might…”
A review of cyberbullying and suggestions for online psychological therapy (2015, methodology): “For example, one recentmeta-analysis conducted by Kowalski et al. (2014) used the general aggression model (GAM) as a framework to consider the problematic behaviour and found that normative beliefs regarding aggression and moral disengagement were associated with cyberbullying perpetration.”