Principal Leadership and Teacher Motivation under High-Stakes Accountability Policies
By Kara S. Finnigan. 2010
135 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education, Information Systems and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/92572f028cdb744140c6144aa67d4201b1dc4790
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- Alan J. Daly
- Christopher R. Gareis
- Viviane M. J. Robinson
- Kara S. Finnigan
- John Lambersky
- Megan Tschannen-Moran
- Karen Seashore Louis
- S. Gümüş
In Information Systems and Management
- John Lambersky
- Karen Seashore Louis
- Viviane M. J. Robinson
- Kara S. Finnigan
- Christopher R. Gareis
- Megan Tschannen-Moran
- Alan J. Daly
- A. Kılınç
Citations in the corpus
- Understanding the Human Side of School Leadership: Principals’ Impact on Teachers’ Morale, Self-Efficacy, Stress, and Commitment (2016, background): “Data were gathered during semi-structured interviews designed to understand the kinds of emotional and relational effects leader actions and behaviors have had on teachers, finding an answer to the question: What kinds of leadership practices have been important in helping to produce the best perfor”
- The effects of distributed leadership on teacher professional learning: mediating roles of teacher trust in principal and teacher motivation (2020, background): “Past research shows this to be the case since it evidences the significant role of school leadership in improving teachers’ job commitment, motivation, and academic optimism (Chang 2011; Finnigan 2010; Hulpia and Devos 2010; Leithwood, Harris, and Hopkins 2008; Thoonen et al. 2011).”
- Faculty trust in the principal: an essential ingredient in high-performing schools (2015, background): “The clear intent of instructional leadership is to improve student learning outcomes by strengthening teachers’ instructional practices (Brown et al., 2004; Finnigan, 2010; Heck and Moriyama, 2010; May and Supovitz, 2011; Robinson et al., 2008).”
- Mind the Gap: Organizational Learning and Improvement in an Underperforming Urban System (2012, background): “…schools tend to be turbulent with high staff turnover, multiple and changing reforms, and challenges related to leadership (Daly 2009; Finnigan 2010, 2012; Finnigan and Daly 2010; Finnigan and Stewart 2009), teacher quality (Sunderman et al. 2005), and teacher motivation (Finnigan…”
- External mandates and instructional leadership: school leaders as mediating agents (2012, background): “The relationship between leadership and teachers’ sense of efficacy was tested in a recent study of Chicago schools under accountability sanctions (Finnigan, 2010).”