Issues Related to Judging the Alignment of Curriculum Standards and Assessments

By N. Webb. 2007

229 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8f01867203c31d227b29c3a0943f674c6855801b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

Citations in the corpus

Evaluating Alignment Between Curriculum, Assessment, and Instruction (2009, background): “As originally formulated, the hits did not need to be within the same standard, although this flexibility has been removed in recent years because that approach could lead to concluding more standards are supported than actually are (Webb, 2007).”
Estimating Critical Values for Strength of Alignment Among Curriculum, Assessments, and Instruction (2011, methodology): “Selecting and Using an Alignment Rubric Blank (2002) lists four models for determining alignment: Webb (cf. Webb, 2007), Surveys of Enacted Curriculum (SEC, as described by Porter, 2002), Achieve (cf. Rothman, Slattery, Vranek, & Resnick, 2002), and Council for Basic Education (CBE).”
A Framework for Analyzing Cognitive Demand and Content-Practices Integration: Task Analysis Guide in Science (2015, background): “While others (e.g., Anderson & Krathwohl, 2001; Porter & Smithson, 2001; Webb, 2007) have developed frameworks for the level of thinking demanded of students, our framework provides for a different conception of cognitive demand and combines cognitive demand with the recent emphasis on the…”
Assessing English Language Learners’ Opportunity to Learn Mathematics: Issues and Limitations (2010, unknown): “L (2007).”
Interpretation of standards with Bloom’s revised taxonomy: a comparison of teachers and assessment experts (2009, methodology): “Webb ( 2007 ) recommends that a panel should consist of five to eight judges and concludes that a larger number of judges increase the reliability.”
How Well Aligned Are State Assessments of Student Achievement With State Content Standards? (2011, background): “There is a criterion for each of the four measures, and a test and standards are deemed to be in alignment if all four criteria are met (Webb, 2007).”