An Exploratory Study of Teachers' Beliefs Regarding the Implementation of Constructivism in Their Classrooms
By J. Beck, Charlene M. Czerniak, Andrew T. Lumpe. 2000
183 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8eb9941445f7eac46e4ac5ebf5c398ec2a8b2fb2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Student teachers' thinking processes and ICT integration: Predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology (2010, background): “For instance, Beck et al. (2000) found a significant relationship between teachers’ gender and their constructivist beliefs in favor of female teachers.”
- The role of a professional learning community in teacher change: a perspective from beliefs and practices (2015, background): “…School entails a hybrid of structural and cultural change by inducing teachers’ motivation (Hunzicker, 2004), enhancing their knowledge and expertise (Beck et al., 2000), challenging their existing practice (McLaughlin & Talbert, 2001), and relieving members’ tension (Grossman et al., 2001).”
- Science Teacher Beliefs and Classroom Practice Related to Constructivism in Different School Settings (2012, background): “They have focused upon (a) constructivism (Beck et al. 2000; Haney et al. 2003; Haney and McArthur 2002; Uzuntiryaki et al. 2010); (b) curriculum (Cronin-Jones 1991); (c) goals of science education (McIntosh and Zeidler 1988); (d) inquiry (Luft 2001; Wallace and Kang 2004); (e) nature of science…”
- Examining mentors' practices for enhancing preservice teachers' pedagogical development in mathematics and science (2007, background): “The mentor’s personal attributes can aid towards instilling positive attitudes and confidence in the mentee (Beck et al., 2000; Matters, 1994), and promoting an environment conducive for the mentee to reflect constructively on teaching practices (Abell & Bryan, 1999; Upson et al., 2002; Zachary,…”