Longitudinal relations of self-efficacy to outcome expectations, interests, and major choice goals in engineering students
By Robert W. Lent, Hung-Bin Sheu, Daniel B. Singley, Janet A. Schmidt, L. Schmidt, Clay S. Gloster. 2008
419 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education, Safety Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8e2edca6b35d78acb710f7918e00f08ca658d5f2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- Mark E. Engberg
- Adam V. Maltese
- Robert H. Tai
- A. Higgins
- C. Mineo
- Harsha N. Perera
- Gregory C. Wolniak
- Caihong R. Li
In Safety Research
- Mercedes C. Santana
- Adam V. Maltese
- Robert H. Tai
- Sandra M. Barbuti
- Nicole Else-Quest
- Harsha N. Perera
- Emily J. Shaw
- Brett D. Jones
Citations in the corpus
- SCCT and Underrepresented Populations in STEM Fields (2017, background): “Lent et al. (2008) and Lent, Sheu, Gloster, and Wilkins (2010) found support for the temporal relationships between self-efficacy, outcome expectations, interests, and goals across two semesters for White and African American engineering students.”
- Math and Science Attitudes and Achievement at the Intersection of Gender and Ethnicity (2013, result): “Empirical evidence has generally supported the assertions of SCCT; for example, Lent et al. (2008) reported that self-efficacy in engineering was linked to later outcome expectations, interest, and goals in a longitudinal study with undergraduate engineering students.”
- Patterns of Persistence in Intended College Major with a Focus on STEM Majors. (2010, methodology): “The SCCT model represents a cyclical and longitudinal process of major choice and career development (Lent et al., 2008).”
- Relations among math self-efficacy, interest, intentions, and achievement: a social cognitive perspective (2018, background): “Although the absence of effects is inconsistent with cross-sectional evidence for a self-efficacy-intentions link (Byars-Winston et al., 2010; Navarro et al., 2007), the findings converge with some previous longitudinal work in the engineering domain (Lent et al., 2008, 2010).”
- Why Do Students Choose Engineering? A Qualitative, Longitudinal Investigation of Students' Motivational Values (2010, background): “SCCT has found application in understanding the career choices of engineering students (Lent et al., 2003, 2008a, 2008b; Trenor et al., 2008) and has some overlapping constructs with expectancy-value theory such as ability beliefs, outcome expectations, and interests (Lent, Brown, and Hackett,…”
- Pipeline persistence: Examining the association of educational experiences with earned degrees in STEM among U.S. students (2011, result): “Conversely, our models did not provide statistical evidence that self-efficacy played a significant role in student persistence, despite work from others (Lent et al., 2008) suggesting that this factor is important in educational and career aspirations.”
- Teacher support, instructional practices, student motivation, and mathematics achievement in high school (2018, result): “This finding is consistent with the findings in vocational domains that self-efficacy has moderate correlation with interest (Rottinghaus et al., 2003; Lent et al., 2008).”
- Help seeking, self-efficacy, and writing performance among college students (2011, positive): “Like help seeking, self-efficacy belief has been found to be a predictor of academic success (e.g., Bouchard, Bouffard, Goulet, Denoncourt, & Couture, 2005; Lent et al. 2008; Pajares, 2003, 2006; Pajares & Usher, 2008; Usher & Pajares, 2008; Zimmerman & Bandura, 1994).”