Patterns of Persistence in Intended College Major with a Focus on STEM Majors.

By Emily J. Shaw, Sandra M. Barbuti. 2010

181 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/35f967565eff7590a7a1392fd6b0958b3d8810ce

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. M. Murphy
2. Phillip L. Ackerman
3. Xianglei Chen
4. R. Kanfer
5. J. LaCosse

In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

1. Xianglei Chen

In Safety Research

1. Phillip L. Ackerman
2. R. Kanfer
3. M. Murphy
4. Xianglei Chen

Citations in the corpus

• Feeling Like an Imposter: The Effect of Perceived Classroom Competition on the Daily Psychological Experiences of First-Generation College Students (2019, background): “These performance and retentions gaps are most pronounced in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fields (American College Testing, 2015; Chen & Carrroll, 2005; Shaw & Barbuti, 2010).”
• High School Advanced Placement and Student Performance in College: STEM Majors, Non-STEM Majors, and Gender Differences (2013, background): “…rates, compared to students who do not receive such credits (e.g., see Ewing, 2006; Eykamp, 2006; Morgan & Klaric, 2007; Sadler & Tai, 2007; Shaw & Barbuti, 2010), although there remain questions about the potential for other influences being partly responsible for such associations (e.g.,…”
• Pursuing STEM Careers: Perspectives of Senior High School Students (2020, background): “Several researches revealed that STEM majors were academically prepared especially in mathematics and science test scores, were successful when it comes to GPA, and persistent in earning a STEM degree (Chen, 2013; Chen & Ho, 2012; Mattern, Radunzel, & Westrick, 2015; Shaw & Barbuti, 2010).”
• Changes in implicit theories of ability in biology and dropout from STEM majors: A latent growth curve approach (2014, unknown): “…and sophomore students; Daempfle, 2004; Gore, 2010; Rigali-Oiler & Kurpius, 2013): (1) student prior achievement (Daempfle, 2004; Rask, 2010; Shaw & Barbuti, 2010) and pre-collegiate educational experiences (Wai, Lubinski, & Benbow, 2009; Wai, Lubinski, Benbow, & Steiger, 2010), (2) student…”
• STEM Attrition: College Students' Paths into and out of STEM Fields. Statistical Analysis Report. NCES 2014-001. (2013, background): “The STEM literature has reported that women, underrepresented minorities, first-generation students, and those from low-income backgrounds tend to have higher STEM attrition rates than their counterparts (Anderson and Kim 2006; Griffith 2010; Hill, Corbett, and Rose 2010; Huang, Taddese, and Walter ”