The Construction and Contributions of "Implications for Practice": What's in Them and What Might They Offer?

205 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Women’s entrepreneurship policy research: a 30-year review of the evidence (2019, background): “Another explanation is that academics may feel uncomfortable in constructing policy implications (Bartunek and Rynes, 2010).”
On the positive aspects of customers: Customer‐initiated support and affective crossover in employee–customer dyads (2011, background): “Academy of Management Journal, 44, 1018–1027.”
Self-Reported Limitations and Future Directions in Scholarly Reports (2013, background): “In line with the work of Bartunek and Rynes (2010), who analyzed the content of sections on implications for practice and provided suggestions aimed at increasing their usefulness, we offer eight specific suggestions for authors, reviewers, and editors to enhance the value of limitations and directi”
Building theory about theory building: What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, , . (2011, background): “…1994; Huff, 2000), practical utility's role in theoretical contribution seems to receive mainly lip service (e.g., several paragraphs on " practical implications " in the discussion section; see Bartunek & Rynes, 2010, for insight into the utility of these sections), especially in recent times.”